Two FAA Squadrons, Vought Chesapeakes ordered to Singapore, Aug 1941

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules


I'm not sure they'd be able to do much against the Japanese in those jungles given the limited training time over the terrain they're fighting over, either. CAS wasn't so highly developed at that stage, I think.
 
I think from the right angle the Skua can look okay.



Better than the Chesapeake.

 
To be honest, I don't know why the RN didn't throw a couple of Skua squadrons towards Singapore. By 1941, it was pretty much out of front-line service but it had comparable performance to the Chesapeake (slightly lower ceiling, bomb load and top speed but higher cruising speed...and the range was ample for Malaya).
 
And dive bombers would have greater accuracy than even low-level bombing.

This is true of course, but would it be enough to change the inevitable? Under very different circumstances the situation in Singapore might have had a different outcome, but I doubt two squadrons of Chesapeakes is going to do much more, as we know. Nevertheless, put them to use, can't do worse.
 

Entirely agree. The best thing they could do for Singapore would be to provide more fighter squadrons...but, as has been discussed numerous times, that probably wasn't going to happen in 1941.
 
I'm not sure they'd be able to do much against the Japanese in those jungles given the limited training time over the terrain they're fighting over, either. CAS wasn't so highly developed at that stage, I think.

True, against shipping it might have some success, but of course the limiting factor the Allies had was their warning time of impending action.

I think from the right angle the Skua can look okay.

True, but you cannae escape that windscreen...

Forgive what might be an ignorant question, but was there a reason the design included such an unaerodynamic windscreen?

Better visibility in level flight and a better aiming point in the dive. Kind'a spoils its looks IMO, and that long snout. The Skua was a big beastie and the pilot is sat real high above the carrier deck.
 
To be honest, I don't know why the RN didn't throw a couple of Skua squadrons towards Singapore.

Yup, true, the type was withdrawn as a frontline type in 1941, so examples could theoretically have been sent, but by whom, of course and then the usual problems arise, like spares support etc...
 
True, against shipping it might have some success, but of course the limiting factor the Allies had was their warning time of impending action.

Right, I get that. Against shipping it would likely be more useful, if the opportunity arose.

Better visibility in level flight and a better aiming point in the dive. Kind'a spoils its looks IMO, and that long snout. The Skua was a big beastie and the pilot is sat real high above the carrier deck.

I'm thinking more about drag than looks. I can see your point about aiming, perhaps, but that long nose still means a steep dive and less time for target-acquisition, no?
 
I'm not sure they'd be able to do much against the Japanese in those jungles given the limited training time over the terrain they're fighting over, either. CAS wasn't so highly developed at that stage, I think.

Actually, the Japanese weren't advancing through the jungle. They were charging down the west coast road and only dispersing to the jungle on either side once they encountered resistance. The much-derided Buffalo established a pretty solid reputation as a strafer, despite only conducting that mission on a few occasions (and, even than, Tsuji mis-identified them as Hurricanes (Hurricane envy perhaps?) which they can't have been because the Hurricane was never used in the strafing role in Malaya...but I digress...again!).

I think a squadron or two of dive bombers would have been rather useful at cutting Japanese resupply and taking out bridges to slow down the advance.
 

Would or could they be called in before contact sent the IJA into the woodwork?

ETA: Dropping bridges could be useful, but could they actually do the job?
 
I'm thinking more about drag than looks. I can see your point about aiming, perhaps, but that long nose still means a steep dive and less time for target-acquisition, no?

Standard practice was to fly past the target until it appeared behind the wing trailing edge, and than pull up and over into the dive. The pilot could keep eyes on the target the entire time except while it was obscured by the wing during straight and level flight. Bottom line - plenty of time for target acquisition and the Skua's nose had no impact on that one way or the other.
 
Would or could they be called in before contact sent the IJA into the woodwork?

Well, the Buffalos were effective at strafing with 4x 50cals (or, in some cases, 2x 50cals and 2x .303s). I think the 4x .303s of the Skua would be just as good against troops and soft-skinned vehicles moving down a road.

ETA: Dropping bridges could be useful, but could they actually do the job?

Good question...I suspect the 500lb SAP that the Skua could carry would probably be good enough. Regardless, hammering the road at one end of the bridge with those bombs would certainly make life hard for the Japanese.
 

Users who are viewing this thread