Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Pb well done Canada. Your Vimy Ridge. Our Menin Gate and Menin Road Ypres and Albert. I have a lot of respect for our Canadian Allies. Well done in restoring those monuments at Vimy Ridge. I have 3 words for you Pb
LEST WE FORGET
I have a book called 'The Donkeys' by Alan Clark, its about 1915 - Neuve Chapelle, 2nd Ypres and Loos, during which the core of Britain's regular army was all but destroyed.
On the first page there is a quote from Falkenhayn's Memoirs: Ludendorff said, "The English fight like lions". To which his colleague Hoffman rejoined, "But don't we know they are led by donkeys".
In reality the artillery might have had a preponderence of Brits but it was Andrew McNaughton who pioneered counter battery fire , made the artillery calibrate each piece (a rather new doctrine ) the pointy end of the stick and the ones that took the ridge were Canadians. Yes Byng was a Brit who flourished working with the Canadians but he was also open to ideas something Haig could never claim
Emac44 - you clearly have issues over something - I suspect a lot of it has nothing at all to do with WW1. The way you write does seem to indicate a certain inner anger. What's with this RANDOM use OF capitals??
You seem unable to accept certain facts of historical record, Haig was commander of all British Empire troops - to blame him for the Somme is like blaming Eisenhower for the battle of the bulge. He is at fault for leaving it too much to Rawlinson but that's delegation for you.
Your original post was clearly seeking to make cheap anti-Brit jibes by ignoring the actual order of battle of the Canadian Corps and carrying on this fantasy that the war was won by the colonies - in spite of the efforts of the Brits.
I notice you still can't provide a single example of an Australian or Canadian general capable of doing what Haig did. You can't compare apples and oranges!
FWIW I don't decry anyone's contribution to the allied effort in WW1, never have. I include them all from the Zoaves and the Indians, the Aussies and cannucks, the Chinese labour Corps and the 4 British Armies (Reg, TF, 'New' and conscript). I also note that the UK lost a million men and the losses of Canada and Australia are roughly equal to that of India.
The best generals of the war were British, followed by the Germans. Some empire generals may have been capable at relatively junior levels but their potential effectiveness in high command can only be conjecture.
The truth may be uncomfortable but I'm afraid that's reality.
Poor history. Now a discredited book. That quote is inaccurate, if it was ever said it was said about Italian Troops.
You really need to read some better books if you're going to comment on WW1
What do you suggest I read? Maybe something good about Haig that wasn't written by a friend. How about a 'better book' that tells me the British Generals tactics of attacking entrenched positions with massed Infantry was a good idea.
There's nothing wrong with your reading material. rogthedodge is simply in character. Upsetting everyone is his 'role'.
'rogthedodge' expands to 'roger the dodger'.
Now..doesn't this site explain everything?
Roger the Dodger