Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Note there are two supercharger wheels, both "half-compressors" since they have vanes on only one side of the wheel.
Okay you hardcore engine guys, it is clear from the posts on this thread that in many cases the wastegate is a simple butterfly valve on the exhaust outlet side of the Turbo-Supercharger. I want to reduce the boost from the Turbo-Supercharger so I close the butterfly valve a bit, creating some back-pressure on the outlet side. This in turn slows the exhaust impeller, and since they are on a common shaft, the intake impeller which reduces the boost.
In the case of the P-47, if I open the wastegate entirely all the exhaust is dumped out of the system at the cowling and the Turbo-Supercharger is essentially un-powered. So how does fresh intake air make it to the Supercharger? Is there a bypass to allow fresh air into the system between the Turbo-Supercharger and the Supercharger? I would think that a Turbo-Supercharger that is not being powered by the exhaust stream would be pretty restrictive to intake airflow.
In the case of the P-38 and others with the wastegate located after the Turbo-Supercharger, as I close the butterfly valve I encounter the same problem on the intake side as the P-47. But it is compounded because I am starting to create back-pressure all the way back up the exhaust system to the exhaust valves. If I close the wastegate entirely I just choke the engine completely, something akin to Eddie Murphy and "The banana in the tailpipe" problem. So I'm guessing the wastegate cannot close entirely or there must be bypasses on both the intake and exhaust sides of the system between the engine and the Turbo-Supercharger.
What am I missing?
wuzak,You could turn the turbo 180° and the wastegate would be ahead of the turbo.
The wastegate in that picture is integral with the turbine housing, but it releases the exhaust from before the turbine.
There was an attempt to control the turbo at its outlet, called the Variable Discharge Turbine (VDT). VDT was developed for, or by, Pratt & Whitney and tested on the R-4360 and R-2800. The control systems were not sophisticated enough in the day to control the turbo accurately, test flights with the R-4360 VDT requiring the engineer to constantly monitor and control the turbo.
Some VDT designs Pratt & Whitney came up with also did away with the engine supercharger.
So the pilot's manuals previously mentioned contain simplified diagrams which do not represent the actual operation of the wastegate and it placement within the exhaust system?
I had a feeling that was the case, hence my request for more detailed documents on the installation of the Turbo-Supercharger.
With regards to the VDT, wasn't that an attempt to provide thrust from the exhaust rather than functioning as a wastegate? Although to some degree it would. Did the VDT engine(s) have a normal wastegate upstream from the Turbocharger, or was the VDT the only device to control boost?
So the pilot's manuals previously mentioned contain simplified diagrams which do not represent the actual operation of the wastegate and it placement within the exhaust system?
wuzak,I think they are accurate, but maybe lack a little explanation.
Here's the B-17 turbo installation diagram from the post you referenced.
The wastegate is to the right of the turbo, and looks like it is after the turbo. It must be realised that the wastegate is connected to the turbine housing and is, in effect, at the end of the exhaust duct. Some more arrows to indicated exhaust flow would be helpful - the exhaust either flows through the wastegate duct, or vertically down through the turbine wheel in that schematic.
So the real difference between the P-47 and the other Turbo-Supercharged aircraft in the USAAF during WWII is the standalone wastegate. I would also assume that is the difference between the 'B' series and the 'C' Turbo-Superchargers.