Why airplanes were designed the way they were.

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

We're not allowed to teach historical American failures
It did lead to the more well known Fairey Barracuda.
Just fit Merlin engine, fold the wing and sling torpedo underneath :)

Just about everybody's "observation" planes of the late 30s were operational failures. Actual combat had changed a lot faster than the requirements. And in many Air Forces one airplane (due to budgets?) was being asked to do too many different missions. And often without support (fighter escort).

Wither they were flight failures (didn't fly well) or had structural problems may be a different story.
 
It did lead to the more well known Fairey Barracuda.
Just fit Merlin engine, fold the wing and sling torpedo underneath :)

Just about everybody's "observation" planes of the late 30s were operational failures. Actual combat had changed a lot faster than the requirements. And in many Air Forces one airplane (due to budgets?) was being asked to do too many different missions. And often without support (fighter escort).

Wither they were flight failures (didn't fly well) or had structural problems may be a different story.
Hi
I think the Westland Walrus (three-seater carrier-borne spotter reconnaissance bi-plane of the 1920s) trumps both:
Scan_20240818.png

(Source: 'Westland Aircraft since 1915' by Derek N James)
Mike
 
Lets not forget this beast

View attachment 793446
The last hurrah for this was at the attack on Pearl harbor when a couple were destroyed on the ground
That beast was a very competent observation airplane and it did yeoman service along the Atlantic coast and the Caribbean looking for U-boats during the war. It only had a Wright R-1820 in it, but could cruise at 220 mph. So, while it was replace by L-4 / L-5 airplane in the ETO (rightly so), it helped the war effort along the coast.

I had the privilege of working to restore one for about 4 years. We are not finished and have moved on to another project (a C-47), but one day another O-47 will fly again. I especially like the observation window below the wing. It makes a GREAT airshow airplane as you can take 5 people along (3 up top and 2 in the belly) so you have some help when you get there!
 
This land-based Swordfish has an angled torpedo. Maybe the FAA did both ways?

View attachment 794761
The caption for this reads:-

"

The Coastal Defence From The Air, A Torpedo Being Attached To A Fairey Swordfish In England During The Thirties

UNITED KINGDOM - JANUARY 01: The Coastal Defence From The Air, A Torpedo Being Attached To A Fairey Swordfish In England During Thirties (Photo by Keystone-France/Gamma-Keystone via Getty Images)"

The first production Swordfish was delivered in Feb 1936 with several early aircraft going to the Torpedo Training Squadron (later renamed the Torpedo Training Unit) at Gosport. That airfield had a number of Type A hangars of the design that appears in the background. The uniform aircraft colour is suggestive of pre-WW2 aluminium dope overall.

1936 also saw the introduction of a new 18" torpedo for dropping from aircraft, the Mark.XI (a successor to the Mk.VIII that had first entered service in 1914). Not many were built before an improved version, the Mk.XII, entered service in 1937 and became the main torpedo used by the RAF & the FAA during the first half of WW2. And that is the weapon that we are used to seeing in pictures of aircraft, including the Swordfish dating from WW2.

Earlier FAA torpedo bombers carried their torpedoes angled nose down e.g. the Blackburn Baffin in service from Jan 1934.

So I would surmise that this photo is of an early Swordfish with a Mk.VIII or Mk.XI torpedo rather than a Mk.XII. Now why the carrying angle needed to be changed I don't know.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back