Why no Fw 190H but the Ta 152H? (2 Viewers)

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

Look at the image I posted in the previous image - the Ta 152H used a NACA 230xx airfoil at the root. The NACA 5-digit airfoils have very little laminar flow.

Hi,

Thanks for that original data page. The Ta 152 H-1 profile seems to indicate both "NACA 230" and Fw in the box, which is different to all the other types shown. Given the very different detail of the 152 H high aspect ratio wing, is it not likely that this shows a root area NACA 230 profile, developing into an unspecified Fw profile in the very different outer sections?

Cheers

Eng
 
From "The Focke Wulf Ta 152" by Hitchcock:
"Steel had long been planned for both the Fw 190 and the Ta 152; specifically for use in the wing spars and skinning despite a 15 to 25 percent weight penalty. "
Since the paragraph it is taken from is a discussion of the wing design I presume it is 15 to 25 percent of the total wing weight, not the entire aircraft.
250 kg would equate to a wing weight of 1000 to 1700 kg. I can't find any info on the wing weights but it doesn't seem reasonable to me.

"Focke Wulf Ta 152" by Dieter Harmann gives a breakdown of weights for the Ta 152 H-0 and H-1.
I was interrupted before I could give the weights . Here they are
1766432733403.png

I used goggle translate for the English names so please correct as needed.
 
I used goggle translate for the English names so please correct as needed.
'Tragwerke' - 'Lifting device' - wing.
The term 'Triebwerke in der Zelle' - Powerplant parts in the airframe' are the fuel tanks and ancillaries to the fuel system, like pumps, lines, controls, valves etc.
'Triebwerke vor the Brandschott' - 'Powerplant in front of the firewall' includes everything in front of the firewall (but not the guns, for example) - engine, engine bearer, cowling, prop, as well as the cooling system etc. Fw 190s and it's cousins were no jokes in this regard :)
 
Hi,

Thanks for that original data page. The Ta 152 H-1 profile seems to indicate both "NACA 230" and Fw in the box, which is different to all the other types shown. Given the very different detail of the 152 H high aspect ratio wing, is it not likely that this shows a root area NACA 230 profile, developing into an unspecified Fw profile in the very different outer sections?

Cheers

Eng

I read the entry in the box as "NACA Fw 230". My interpretation of this is that its saying that the wing airfoils are a Focke Wulf modification of a NACA 230xx airfoil. My guess is that its a modification of the trailing edge, probably by extending the chord, like was done when creating the wing of the A321 from the wing of the A320.

At this point in the war, the Germans were building fighters as fast as possible. To enable this, any changes in design had to be easy to incorporate on the assembly line, involving the maximum reuse of tooling. Changing the whole wing to a different airfoil would require a lot of new tooling. And, I have never seen evidence that Focke Wulf or the AVA developed any laminar flow airfoils during the war. The only German wartime testing of a laminar flow airfoil that I've seen involved the airfoil of the P-51.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back