Stona, I know you weren't arguing that. Davebender was, and I was pointing out his error.
No worries,sorry I misunderstood
Steve
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Stona, I know you weren't arguing that. Davebender was, and I was pointing out his error.
By fall 1940 most Me-110s belonged to night fighter units. There was never a Me-410 night fighter variant so how can anyone suggest it was to succeed the Me-110?
Authorized strength should be about 100 aircraft per geschwader. Plus additional Me-110s for night fighter training units and spares to replace combat losses.
plus night fighter groups early on were routinely of smaller size to their daylight counterparts. It is unlikely that the "authorized" strength for an NJG was anything like 100 a/c. training night capable crews is a tedious, slow process. Early on, it would not surprise me to find individual stafeln with "authorized" strengths of 4 or 5 a/c.
Hence the reason Me-110 escort fighters were overwhelmed during the BoB and (later) unable to protect German cities from RAF Bomber Command.They were not overwhelmed due to a lack of numbers. They fought (with the exception of units making independent low level bombing attacks) at a tactical disadvantage. It is no secret that they struggled to compete with the RAF's single engined fighters.
It was an aircraft that wouldn't die in a production sense. It's death knell was sounded on numerous occassions from late 1942 onwards but the funeral was always postponed. It proved itself a capable work horse,capable of some development,and a long term stop gap as projects for a replacement (or replacements for its various roles) foundered.
Cheers
Steve
Hence the reason Me-110 escort fighters were overwhelmed during the BoB and (later) unable to protect German cities from RAF Bomber Command.
the Ju 88 was far better suited for the task.
Neither statement is true. During the BoB the 110 was effective and gave good account and destroyed a large number of RAF fighters. The destoyer arm itself was badly mauled in the proccess, but that was largely because there were too few destroyers around and it generally fought in numerical disadvantage, and the losses taken effected the 110 units, few in number, than those of the numerous 109 units.
As for failing to protect German cities from BC - we should recall that Bomber Command's strategy essentially failed and was defeated during the Battle of Berlin in 1944. The Nachtjagd was winning the night while the Tagjagd was loosing the day at the same time.
As a night fighter its most obvious limitation was that the airframe was not designed for such tasked. The pure 110 lacked the range required for the task, and could only fullfill it with external stores , i.e. droptanks, cannon pods etc. hanging from every possible direction. A night fighter required plenty of loiter time, and the 110 simply did not have it, the Ju 88 OTOH had, since it was designed from the start with long range in mind (being a bomber and all). The good point of the 110 was first and foremost that it was available when needed, where needed, and could be modified for the task quickly. AFAIK it also had very docile landing and handling charachteristics, important for a night fighter which has to take off and land in bad visibility conditions. But the Ju 88 was far better suited for the task.
Max
I just may come after the new year...........
interested folk purchase the dual volume set by Dr. Theo Boiten/Rod McKenzie > Nachtjagd War Diaries < updated completely in 2015.
Nachtjagd shot down a lot of RAF bombers but not enough to put RAF Bomber Command out of business.