Admiral Beez
Major
I've just finished reading this book on the Fairey Flycatcher, The Fairey Flycatcher by | Book in preparation for my build of a 1/48 scale model kit of same.
In the book, the Flycatcher had three landing gear set ups. One with conventional wheels, another with flat-profiled floats which had integrated wheels, and lastly v-profile floats without wheels. At Hong Kong, HMS Hermes usually operated Flycatchers in the last format, with wheel-less floats (as shown in this model), meaning that the aircraft had to brought up to the the flightdeck on rolling platforms, and then craned over the side to the water. The book also says that the wheel-less Flycatcher was trialed on a larger Courageous class carrier for landing and taking off from a greased flightdeck, here's the video.
But why didn't the FAA just use their floats with wheels? You'd then have the option of using HMS Hermes as both a seaplane and conventional aircraft carrier.
Postwar amphibious floats have retractable wheels at the front. Perhaps this added too much weight, complexity or cost in the 1920s.
In the book, the Flycatcher had three landing gear set ups. One with conventional wheels, another with flat-profiled floats which had integrated wheels, and lastly v-profile floats without wheels. At Hong Kong, HMS Hermes usually operated Flycatchers in the last format, with wheel-less floats (as shown in this model), meaning that the aircraft had to brought up to the the flightdeck on rolling platforms, and then craned over the side to the water. The book also says that the wheel-less Flycatcher was trialed on a larger Courageous class carrier for landing and taking off from a greased flightdeck, here's the video.
But why didn't the FAA just use their floats with wheels? You'd then have the option of using HMS Hermes as both a seaplane and conventional aircraft carrier.
Postwar amphibious floats have retractable wheels at the front. Perhaps this added too much weight, complexity or cost in the 1920s.
Last edited: