Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Its my understanding that the Navy liked radial engines so much because they were capable of making lots of power in a more compact and lighter-weight design, compared to a more "normal" engine lay-out.3. Don't underestimate the rivalry between the Army and the Navy. The Navy wanted nothing to do with the Army's liquid-cooled Allisons. Instead, the Navy preferred the lighter, more reliable radials. It was hard, too, to get the Army to accept the R2800 for the P-47, because it was pushing the Allison so much.
CD
I personoly think the Fiat CR.42 Falco was a piece of cr@p. After all, biplane with a rotary engine is dead against even the P-40, which was slow but powerfully tough in its own right, no matter what.
The Stringbag was a bi plane but did'nt do too bad with a toss up between the Bag and the SBD in the naval tonnage/kill ratio war.
I personoly think the Fiat CR.42 Falco was a piece of cr@p. After all, biplane with a rotary engine is dead against even the P-40, which was slow but powerfully tough in its own right, no matter what.
Hmmmm.....
In certain if not many combat situations, the CR.42 could out maneuver a number of modern WW2 monoplanes INCLUDING the P-40. The CR.42 was far from a "piece of crap" as the aircraft performed as designed; the only real handicap is its design was outdated. Operationally the aircraft worked as advertised.
I suggest you study how these aircraft were flown operationally and understand how they could be flown to their maximum advantage. In essence the CR.42 was one of the best bi-plane fighters ever built abet being one of the last.
An aircraft is a "piece of crap" when it can't perform to its design specification. The Breda 88 is one at the top of the list. All major WW2 combatants had dogs of their own.
Tougher? In what way? Faster? Longer combat duration? More agressive? That involves pilot skill, not the aircraft. You could have all the armament in the world and if you can't hit anything, what good is it? The Finns used Buffalos and had one of the best kill ratios of the war against more modern aircraft but yet there are some on here who thing the Buffalo was one of the worse fighters of WW2. There comes a time where equipment will make a difference but pilot skill will also be a deciding factor.Oh...but I thought that agility was as good as nothing when your dealing with enemies who are tougher and have better armament...