Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
I was wondering about availability of Merlins for the "Torbattle". Use V-1710s?
I've never claimed to be an aviation expert but I never heard of this engine before.View attachment 814679
View attachment 814680
The Fairey Monarch could have worked, one of the few instances where a twin block setup worked well, unlike every other H or Twin block tried during the War. Real missed opportunity for 1800-2000HP early in the War
- Select a country and an air service.
- Select dates to start design, and introduce the aircraft into service. It should take three years to design a new aircraft, but blind, screaming panic mode over three months has had good results.
- Consider available resources. The Germans and Japanese fantasized about bombing the USA, but it was not happening. If your proposal is resource heavy, describe what other activity will be discontinued. Forget about not invading Russia. The whole point of WWII in Europe was to invade Russia.
- Select an aircraft manufacturer and engine(s).
- In context of WWII, new engine design from scratch takes too long. According to writer Bill Gunston, it takes five or six years to design a new engine and get it working. All the important engines of WWII were running prior to or very early in the war. You may propose upgrades of existing engines.
- Understand doctrine, design practise, and available technology of the nation and manufacturer. For example, the Russians did not see a requirement for high altitude combat. They did not make aircraft out of metal, and they did not have turbochargers. The Soviet P-47 Thunderbolt was not happening.
- Discuss how the aircraft will work, and justify your design decisions.
- You may design from scratch, or modify something that already exists.
Nifty,Bf 109X-2:
- Germany, LW (and possibly KM)
- 1938 as the start, in service in 1941
- Good
- MTT; BMW 801
- Good x2
- The Bf 109X with the set of wings from the Bf 109T. Let's say that Fw has it's plate full with the Fw 187, there is no Bf 110 as a fighter in service, and the Do 217 is the only aircraft powered with the BMW 801, leaving a good number of engines free. MTT makes the 109X as described. Four cannons, 485L of internal fuel + the drop tank, main wheel track at ~2.5m vs. ~2m for the DB-powered versions. Also a better cockpit than the 109. Praised for it's good/great performance, stable stance during the take-off and landing, good visibility and heavy firepower, with the temperamental engine being the only source of problems worth speaking about.
- (a bash between the drawings of the 109X and 109T from Wikipedia)
View attachment 814788