- Thread starter
-
- #21
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
You and I know that...Who cares? Shelling from a battleship is not strategic bombing.
a few posts back, you stated:Where did I claim that? You claimed the USN didn't attack Japan directly until July, & you are wrong.
The only thing that got worked over, was the FranklinWhat would've stopped them 6 months earlier was that they were busy invading Iwo Jima.
As I noted earlier, the USN did work over Nippon in Feb 1945, between the Iwo, & Okinawa jobs.
( when it was "convenient", & why not).
Based on what data?
Do you Know what the tonnages are? Or is it a guess? There were hundreds of bomb capable aircraft available,
& they'd even put ashore many of the torpedo only planes, due to lack of potential targets,
They didn't beat any Japanese defenses...and you do NOT even start to lecture me on "besmirching" ANY casualties.Funny no "battlewagons" there, but the USN was, & beat the hell out of the Japanese defences.
Shame on you to besmirch the 700 American boys who died on the Franklin like that too..
Nope...wrong, your circular argument is falling apart and growing very tiresome.I just did..
& the USSBS* reports that USN aircraft ( not even counting thousands of massive artillery shells) dropped
"6,800 tons" of bombs on Japan, 3/4ths of which were "directed against...military targets" & the other 1/4th
on "economic" targets, & "accuracy was high...at least 50% hits within 250 ft of the aiming point".
* US Strategic Bombing Survey.
I just did..
& the USSBS* reports that USN aircraft ( not even counting thousands of massive artillery shells) dropped
"6,800 tons" of bombs on Japan, 3/4ths of which were "directed against...military targets" & the other 1/4th
on "economic" targets, & "accuracy was high...at least 50% hits within 250 ft of the aiming point".
* US Strategic Bombing Survey.
The Luftwaffe dropped around 45,000 short tons (41,000 t) of bombs during the Blitz disrupting production and transport, reducing food supplies and shaking the British morale. It also helped to support the U-Boat blockade by sinking some 58,000 long tons (59,000 t) of shipping destroyed and 450,000 long tons (460,000 t) damaged.
Yes, ta, & in how many attacks? How many tons per raid?
Over a period of 267 days, London was attacked 71 times, Birmingham, Liverpool and Plymouth eight times, Bristol six, Glasgow five, Southampton four, Portsmouth and Hull three and a minimum of one large raid on eight other cities.
Based on what data?
Do you Know what the tonnages are? Or is it a guess? There were hundreds of bomb capable aircraft available,
& they'd even put ashore many of the torpedo only planes, due to lack of potential targets,
I just did..
& the USSBS* reports that USN aircraft ( not even counting thousands of massive artillery shells) dropped
"6,800 tons" of bombs on Japan, 3/4ths of which were "directed against...military targets" & the other 1/4th
on "economic" targets, & "accuracy was high...at least 50% hits within 250 ft of the aiming point".
* US Strategic Bombing Survey.
And why would you want to? How many Helldivers or bomb carrying Avengers does it take to equal one B-29 tonnage wise?
OK, I'll bite. What "torpedo only planes" did the US, Navy have?
I wasn't involved directly in that particular discussion, sport.Yeah right, is that why you have "shut up" on the Merlin-Meteor matter G-G,
& you just can't admit it - when you are wrong..proved wrong, just like in this thread.
Didn't you mean the C-54 instead of the B-29?So, one B-29 crew=11, or after LeMay and XXI AF removed the defensive armament and crew, even less v. 10 carrier planes crewed by either two or three, say 25 total crew, plus the fuel for 10 engines v. 4 (albeit LARGE engines). 10 chances for a plane and crew loss or a bomb miss v. 1. Mmm... so far not seeing the advantage of having the USN try to do XXI Bomber Commands job.
Also, thanks for the info SR6.
Didn't you mean the C-54 instead of the B-29?
C-54 mine dropping crew.Didn't you mean the C-54 instead of the B-29?