Aces with 200+ victories: how do they stack up in 2012?

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

Njaco said:
Or USAAF 8th AF in '43-44? More action = more mistakes. Its the nature of the business and really not an exact science. I can take whatever fudging the numbers that appears - unless its blatant. But I will also accept what the record books say. Hartmann = 352. 'nuff said. And at this stage of the game, does it really matter?
Click to expand...

I have found two things regarding 8th AF FIGHTER claims/credits in contrast with other USAAF units in other theatres. First, the VCB had pretty good systematic processes that a.) described a destroyed aircraft, and b.) required eye witness corroboration or conclusive combat film. There were a lot of downgrades after thourough Intelligence Offcer cross examinations - and even more when the claims arrived at VCB for final judgment.

The second thing I am finding is that while incomplete, the LW accounting of their losses was objective. Where many overclaims result in contrast with a LW review >60% damaged is the infamous crash landing in which the aircraft was ultimately repaired.

Last comment. As I have done many deep dives in various battles I have found the fighter claims are about 100% of the associated LW write offs - the only problem with that is that by gawd, the bombers DID shoot some fighters down so the result has been about 10% overclaim to matching LW losses as a Generalization.
 
I only brought the 8th up because I just read where on one of the runs in Nov. 44, there were somewhere in the area of 200 claims made by bomber gunners when the LW lost only about 37 a/c. And I'm going off memory here and please, I don't want this to be construed as a bash on the 8th or any other AF. I just see claims/credits as not a concrete endeavour.
 
The 8th AF knew when they were giving credits for aircraft shot down by bomber gunners that there could be no relation between the totals credited, and aircraft actually shot down.

They wanted to give every encouragement possible to those gunners going thru misery, and danger to man those guns. Every aircraft thru a bomber formation got shot at by multiple gunners, if anybody saw a aircraft go down, everybody who fired on it, or thought they did, got credit. Not 1/20th or whatever, but 1 whole credit. Very few people would be checking their watches and logging when they fired, or logging when they saw a aircraft smoking or explode.
Everything was sorted out in the debriefing, a really hopeless way to sort out the facts of how many were actually shot down.
 
Vincenzo said:
drgodong in your work have you checked all others allieds claims that may overlap with those of 8th AF FC?
Click to expand...

Yes - the important questions regarding Allied calims other than 8th and 9th AF for ETO are Spitfire claims from August 1942 through Dec 1943 because the RAF was continually supporting Penetration and Withdrawals for both USAAF units - as well as TAC claims for sweeps etc... Then fast forward to Post D-Day ops through the Battle of the Bulge when more RAF Wings were in contact with LW.

To eliminate such noise, I then dove into air combat engagements in Germany where the combatants were majority 8th/9th FC Mustangs and 8th AF Lightnings from December 1943 through September 1944... when neither RAF nor 8th/9th AF Thunderbolts were significant factors in Most of the air battles for which there is a lot of data.
 
Juha said:
T's and C's book is unreliable source, not necessarily because of errors by writers. For ex Mason's Battle over Britain, which was a groundbreaking book in late 60s is now unreliable source because research has gone ahead and we know much more than in 60s, not because of that Mason was/is poor aviation historian. I recall reading/hearing somewhere that Hartmann wasn't overly enthusiant on T's and C's project and gave somewhat lukewarm support to it, so T and C had to fill up some blanks from other sources. And of course they didn't have access to Soviet archives so Soviet part of the story is based on what Germans knew/thought they knew/wanted to tell on that side of the story. And the stories of the bounty and trial not necessarily originated from Hartmann.

Juha
Click to expand...

I've been reading this thread with great interest since becoming a brand spanking new member here; however, this post raised my eyebrows and I felt compelled to respond. I am the grandson of the late Col. Raymond F. Toliver who has many of you know is one of the authors of the book "The Blond Knight of Germany". Since my grandfather's passing I've recently come into possession of my grandfather's research papers for "The Blond Knight of Germany". Included with the papers are the original hand signed letters and documents (over 100) between my grandfather and Erich Hartmann starting in 1956 when my grandfather's research for the book officially got off the ground with his very first letter from Erich Hartmann written in German dated January 14, 1956. The letter was sent to my grandfather while he was stationed at Wethersfield Air Force base in Essex, England.

Although I'm still researching the documents, one thing I can say for sure is that any reference that you've heard or read that Erich Hartmann wasn't "enthusiant" and only gave "lukewarm" support to the Blond Knight project is completly false. The letters between my grandfather and Erich clearly show that there was a very close working relationship and Erich was very cooperative and enthusisatic for the project. The letters support this without any doubt including the letters after the book was published. Many of the letters are personal in nature and it is very evident there was a bond between my grandfather and Erich.

There is a historical aspect to the documents that shows the work and research my grandfather devoted for over 12 years in writing the "Blond Knight of Germany". The letters between my grandfather and Eric have never been made public. I plan to release many of the letters and documents as I continue my own research. In an age when there were no faxes, internet, etc., I find it remarkable the amount of research my grandfather was able to gather into making "The Blond Knight of Germany".
 
Hi Ray,

Welcome aboard! There seems to be a common thread that "modern" histories are somehow superior than older works. Part of the problem lies in the lack of source identification in many histories from the 50s and 60s. Equally problemmatic are incorrect statements made in some older histories that have since been accepted as "fact" - just because something is published does not make it correct. Unfortunately, it's a tangled web for those of us who strive to gain deeper understanding and bring the best of "old" histories with the wider access to "new" source material that the internet and the opening of new source material has made possible.

Personally, I'm amazed at what your grandfather managed to achieve in an era without ready access to the internet. You should, rightly, be proud of his accomplishments.

Cheers,
B-N
 
Hello Buffnut,

Thank you for welcoming me aboard. You're right about the old and the new as it pertains to early historical works and today. One thing is for sure, my grandfather was meticulous at documenting and organizing his research for the facts. As I go through what I will call the "Hartmann Papers", I can see numerous instances where my grandfather would strive for accuracy and investigate Erich's documentation, particularly if Erich was uncertain about dates. One instance that comes to mind was Erich's encounter with P-51s and my grandfather's ensuing research through fighter unit records to assure date accuracy. Again, these are documents that have never been made public and I plan to make them available soon.

Thank you again for the welcome! I appreciate your thoughts and time!

Raymond Kemp
 
Raymond Kemp said:
Hello Buffnut,

Thank you for welcoming me aboard. You're right about the old and the new as it pertains to early historical works and today. One thing is for sure, my grandfather was meticulous at documenting and organizing his research for the facts. As I go through what I will call the "Hartmann Papers", I can see numerous instances where my grandfather would strive for accuracy and investigate Erich's documentation, particularly if Erich was uncertain about dates. One instance that comes to mind was Erich's encounter with P-51s and my grandfather's ensuing research through fighter unit records to assure date accuracy. Again, these are documents that have never been made public and I plan to make them available soon.

Thank you again for the welcome! I appreciate your thoughts and time!

Raymond Kemp
Click to expand...


I wish in the near future that we youth keep to taking care of such valuable historical records. I'm reminded of how I had a passion for aviation when I was younger, when kids were out watching the newest shows I was with my father building model aircraft, that fueled a passion for history and aviation that I still have today, I can recal some of those weekends and weekdays like they were yesterday. Granted I did have a huge passion for Beast Wars back when I was a kid :D

I just hope that in this world of texting and acronyms we don't end up writing full historical records in acronyms, can you imagine the horror?

I'm glad that someone like your grandfather kept those records well after his book was released, and am glad that you have a chance to share these true treasures with the rest of the world. :)

Thank you your posts made my week,

Igor


P.S. Welcome to the forum! I can't beleive I forgot that :D
 
Welcome to the forum Mr. Kemp! I have a very well worn copy of "The Blonde Knight of Germany" (bought in 1972) along with "Horrido". Very glad you could shed some light on the research process your grandfather went through!
 
Thank you Igor and Njaco!

I'm looking forward to sharing these newly found treasures of my grandfather's research and Erich Hartmann's life. A few years before my grandfather passed away he told me he had an extensive collection of letters from Erich Hartmann dating all the way back to 1956. I found the letters a few months ago and had no idea just how many letters there were and the detailed information they contained. He was a very meticulous record keeper and all of the original letters are in date order and in many cases coupled with his own notes, etc. I've already located some documentation that I don't believe has surfaced within the historical community.

I've met Erich Hartmann a couple times when I was a boy. Looking back I never gave it too much thought who all those people were coming to my grandparents house while I was visiting during summer break at school when I was a youngster. Rall, Galland, Steinhoff, Hartmann plus a gaggle of other German and American aces were all guests at my grandparent's home over the years. Looking back I wish I got to know them better!

Again, thank you both for welcoming me aboard!
 
Raymond Kemp said:
Hello Buffnut,

Thank you for welcoming me aboard. You're right about the old and the new as it pertains to early historical works and today. One thing is for sure, my grandfather was meticulous at documenting and organizing his research for the facts. As I go through what I will call the "Hartmann Papers", I can see numerous instances where my grandfather would strive for accuracy and investigate Erich's documentation, particularly if Erich was uncertain about dates. One instance that comes to mind was Erich's encounter with P-51s and my grandfather's ensuing research through fighter unit records to assure date accuracy. Again, these are documents that have never been made public and I plan to make them available soon.

Thank you again for the welcome! I appreciate your thoughts and time!

Raymond Kemp
Click to expand...

Raymond - I met Adolph Galland and Hans Scharff through your father and crossed paths several times at various Fighter Aces Reunions. He was a very good man for a Hun driver.. (a joke BTW, the F-100 was notoriously hard to fly)

Regards,

Bill Marshall
 
..some new documentary evidence from Hartmann himself would indeed be interesting!

...just a comment regarding Hartmann's 'official' score - as it has been referred to throughout this thread..

.. 289 of Hartmann's 'victories' were 'officially' confirmed before the German claims sytem broke down in early 1945. Since the German claims system broke down it follows that Hartmann never filed 352 claims 'officially'. In fact 307 of his claims were 'officially' filed before the end of the war...


FWIW I've detailed some of the Russian research into Hartmann's claims at the link below. I thought it would be interesting to actually see what the Russian research was saying about how Hartmann over-claimed and on which dates/encounters this is most evident
http://falkeeins.blogspot.co.uk/2010/03/erich-hartman-352-victories-or-80.html
 
Last edited:
Raymond Kemp said:
I've been reading this thread with great interest since becoming a brand spanking new member here; however, this post raised my eyebrows and I felt compelled to respond. I am the grandson of the late Col. Raymond F. Toliver who has many of you know is one of the authors of the book "The Blond Knight of Germany". Since my grandfather's passing I've recently come into possession of my grandfather's research papers for "The Blond Knight of Germany". Included with the papers are the original hand signed letters and documents (over 100) between my grandfather and Erich Hartmann starting in 1956 when my grandfather's research for the book officially got off the ground with his very first letter from Erich Hartmann written in German dated January 14, 1956. The letter was sent to my grandfather while he was stationed at Wethersfield Air Force base in Essex, England.

Although I'm still researching the documents, one thing I can say for sure is that any reference that you've heard or read that Erich Hartmann wasn't "enthusiant" and only gave "lukewarm" support to the Blond Knight project is completly false. The letters between my grandfather and Erich clearly show that there was a very close working relationship and Erich was very cooperative and enthusisatic for the project. The letters support this without any doubt including the letters after the book was published. Many of the letters are personal in nature and it is very evident there was a bond between my grandfather and Erich...
Click to expand...

Hello Raymond
thanks for correcting the claim of Hartmann's "lukewarm" intrest to the Blond Knight project.

Juha
 
drgondog said:
Raymond - I met Adolph Galland and Hans Scharff through your father and crossed paths several times at various Fighter Aces Reunions. He was a very good man for a Hun driver.. (a joke BTW, the F-100 was notoriously hard to fly)

Regards,

Bill Marshall
Click to expand...

Hello Bill! Your name sounds familar. Were you by chance at the St. Louis reunion around 1970? Nice to meet you here!

Ray
 
FalkeEins said:
..some new documentary evidence from Hartmann himself would indeed be interesting!

...just a comment regarding Hartmann's 'official' score - as it has been referred to throughout this thread..

.. 289 of Hartmann's 'victories' were 'officially' confirmed before the German claims sytem broke down in early 1945. Since the German claims system broke down it follows that Hartmann never filed 352 claims 'officially'. In fact 307 of his claims were 'officially' filed before the end of the war...


FWIW I've detailed some of the Russian research into Hartmann's claims at the link below. I thought it would be interesting to actually see what the Russian research was saying about how Hartmann over-claimed and on which dates/encounters this is most evident
FalkeEins - the Luftwaffe blog: Erich Hartmann JG 52 - 352 victories ..or 80 ? (last edited September 2012) Russian research Dimitri Khazanov
Click to expand...

Thank you for taking the time to bring me up to speed on this subject. I've been following the threads on this subject here and on other sites for several months now. I do have some perspectives that I want to share on the subject, but I'll wait a bit while I complete my research. I have some interviews scheduled in California in a couple weeks on this and other topics as they pertain to my grandfather's work.

Again, thank you for taking the time in sharing some of your insights.

Ray
 
... Rall, Galland, Steinhoff, Hartmann plus a gaggle of other German and American aces were all guests at my grandparent's home over the years. ...
Click to expand...

Man, that gave me goosebumps!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)

Similar threads

D
About strafing Aces
Replies
3
Views
713
eagledad
E
Demopan78
Ta 152 Ha aerial victories
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
Demopan78
Demopan78
Demopan78
yak-9U aerial victories
Replies
0
Views
423
Demopan78
Demopan78
N
How does Ural bombers(Ju-89/Do-19) compared to stuff luke B-17 or Lancaster?
Replies
1
Views
653
GregP
GregP
G
How many Night Fighters did Bomber Command shoot down?
Replies
2
Views
921
mig2830
M
Back