AI Fails (3 Viewers)

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

This works nice..... AI Image Detector Identify ai generated images

1765572036871.png


1765572074646.png
 
Well....this is beyond words....words fail me. While the test photo above shows "real looking aircraft and ships" I took another photo from this thread and ran it through the link posted above. As you can see, there is no doubting the photo is AI. I really expected the web site to vomit all over itself but the result stunned me,,,,stunned I tells ya. I've deleted the Bookmark

1765576399898.png


1765576458276.png
 
Well....this is beyond words....words fail me. While the test photo above shows "real looking aircraft and ships" I took another photo from this thread and ran it through the link posted above. As you can see, there is no doubting the photo is AI. I really expected the web site to vomit all over itself but the result stunned me,,,,stunned I tells ya. I've deleted the Bookmark
We're doomed.
 
Well....this is beyond words....words fail me. While the test photo above shows "real looking aircraft and ships" I took another photo from this thread and ran it through the link posted above. As you can see, there is no doubting the photo is AI. I really expected the web site to vomit all over itself but the result stunned me,,,,stunned I tells ya. I've deleted the Bookmark
There is another small drawback as well, Geo. If you have a real photo that was enhanced with AI or some program online, it can be misidentified as an AI-generated photo. Tried some of my B-25 photos (real) before and after enhancement. The enhanced one showed 97% possibility it is an AI-generated image. That's too much for a "small" error.
Original:
xc.jpg


Enhanced:
xc_imgup.png

Tool's verdict:
AI Image Detector Identify ai generated images.png

My verdict: we, humans must be very careful!
 
There is another small drawback as well, Geo. If you have a real photo that was enhanced with AI or some program online, it can be misidentified as an AI-generated photo. Tried some of my B-25 photos (real) before and after enhancement. The enhanced one showed 97% possibility it is an AI-generated image. That's too much for a "small" error.
Original:
View attachment 859893

Enhanced:
View attachment 859894
Tool's verdict:
View attachment 859895
My verdict: we, humans must be very careful!
Agreed. There are probably better more accurate tools to detect AI but my Scottish heritage says, "You're not going to pay for something are you?".
 
There is another small drawback as well, Geo. If you have a real photo that was enhanced with AI or some program online, it can be misidentified as an AI-generated photo. Tried some of my B-25 photos (real) before and after enhancement. The enhanced one showed 97% possibility it is an AI-generated image. That's too much for a "small" error.
Original:
View attachment 859893

Enhanced:
View attachment 859894
Tool's verdict:
View attachment 859895
My verdict: we, humans must be very careful!

I would hate to have been on that aircraft if a single JATO had failed to fire or shut off prematurely.
 
Well....this is beyond words....words fail me. While the test photo above shows "real looking aircraft and ships" I took another photo from this thread and ran it through the link posted above. As you can see, there is no doubting the photo is AI. I really expected the web site to vomit all over itself but the result stunned me,,,,stunned I tells ya. I've deleted the Bookmark


It appears that the critique was itself written by AI. That's not joking.
 
There is another small drawback as well, Geo. If you have a real photo that was enhanced with AI or some program online, it can be misidentified as an AI-generated photo. Tried some of my B-25 photos (real) before and after enhancement. The enhanced one showed 97% possibility it is an AI-generated image. That's too much for a "small" error.
Original:
View attachment 859893

Enhanced:
View attachment 859894
Tool's verdict:
View attachment 859895
My verdict: we, humans must be very careful!
That teaches you not to use Adobe :lol:
 
In my news feed this morning:


Creepy, zany and demonstrably fake content is often called "slop." The word's proliferation online, in part thanks to the widespread availability of generative artificial intelligence, landed it Merriam-Webster's 2025 word of the year.

"It's such an illustrative word," said Greg Barlow, Merriam-Webster's president, in an exclusive interview with The Associated Press ahead of Monday's announcement. "It's part of a transformative technology, AI, and it's something that people have found fascinating, annoying and a little bit ridiculous."

"Slop" was first used in the 1700s to mean soft mud, but it evolved more generally to mean something of little value. The definition has since expanded to mean "digital content of low quality that is produced usually in quantity by means of artificial intelligence."

In other words, "you know, absurd videos, weird advertising images, cheesy propaganda, fake news that looks real, junky AI-written digital books," Barlow said.


Read the whole article:

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back