Snautzer01
Honourably banned
- 42,549
- Mar 26, 2007
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
But here in Canada we're sitting on a pile of unexploited rare-earth minerals. In the long term, perhaps 25 years China could be replaced in part by Canadians mines, with batteries produced in the US.
There's nothing that China supplies that we cannot ultimately get elsewhere, and with less political risk and baggage.
I don't know the ins and outs of battery composition., but a 25-year spool-up period doesn't sound promising. As much as we'd prefer otherwise, I think we're stuck with doing business with China, at some level. The shock of cutting China out of the world economy would make our Russian sanctions look like child's-play, and that's if you can get developing nations onboard with your thinking.
And that work i think both ways. Besides China has spent years and fortunes on the silk route. Would not be very profitable to throw that away.If people are complaining about the side effects of sanctioning Russia they would not survive sanctioning China. China is such a big part of the global economy it is impossible to cut them out now.
AgreedAnd that work i think both ways. Besides China has spent years and fortunes on the silk route. Would not be very profitable to throw that away.
Who's complaining? We're seeing a virtual oneupmanship of countries and especially private and public corporations and brands racing to put stronger sanctions than one another. On China I agree, and I want them to get onside, that's all.If people are complaining about the side effects of sanctioning Russia they would not survive sanctioning China. China is such a big part of the global economy it is impossible to cut them out now.
Who's complaining? We're seeing a virtual oneupmanship of countries and especially private and public corporations and brands racing to put stronger sanctions than one another. On China I agree, and I want them to get onside, that's all.