Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
I will take Eurasian Times with a grain of salt. Not all, but quite a few authors have a pro-Russian bias and take RuMoD claims for granted.Can the Ukrainian Air Force's Fencers armed with AGM-45 Shrike take these out? Can its sensors locate GPS jammers?
Is this missile useful at all for Ukraine?
AGM-88 HARM: 'Ineffective' In Ukraine War, US Navy To Acquire Converted Anti-Radiation Missiles For Aerial Targets
The US Navy will acquire dozens of new high-speed aerial targets converted from outdated AGM-88 High-Speed Anti-Radiation Missiles or HARMeurasiantimes.com
Those are daily loses or acumulative?Visually confirmed artillery loses for last month, it's much less that Ukrainian claims, but trend is the same.
View attachment 728705
Interesting that just after I posted about Rouble, Financial Times finds the topic interesting too.You may remember that at the start of the war the rouble crumpled to historic record lows just to recover by April 2022.
View attachment 728361
Reasons: Russia had stocked reserves to cover for western reaction. Plus the sudden drop of imports artificially inflated the ruble. In addition it became an intervened currency with litle to no international trade, so its official trade value didn't reflect its real value.
However things changed in 2023: Probably Putin's reserves are gone, plus it seems oil price cap made its impact. . This is how rouble looks now:
View attachment 728362
And it fares even worse against euro:
View attachment 728363
The HARM should work very well against the jammers it they are within practical attack range. Although the GPS jamming systems may be equipped with serious 'spoofing' (one example is signal switching) capability it they are set up properly.
The only GPS signal emitters (as far as I know) are either the GPS satellites or GPS jammers. As such, friendly GPS receiver devices/systems should not be vulnerable to attack by the ARM. The later AGM-88 HARMs are capable of being programmed to not engage outside of various sections of space - air and/or ground. There might be a possibility of the HARM picking up on the weak secondary reflection signal from large GPS ground station receiver antennae (maybe, IDK) at very short range, but the programming of the HARMs should prevent attack if the reflected signals are too weak or are not in the allowed attack sector. So unless the Ukrainians are also jamming GPS signals there should be no problem with homing on friendly GPS guidance systems.
However, the GPS signals are in the NATO D-band (from 1-2 GHz) which covers the upper part of the 'old' L-band (390 MHz - 1.55 GHz) and the lower part of the 'old' S-band (1.55 - 3.9 GHz). Both of these bands are still used by various radars, particularly the S-band. But there is no more reason to worry about the HARM homing on a friendly emitter than when targeting enemy radar emitters in the L & S-bands.
Looks like cumulative.Those are daily loses or acumulative?
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Biden administration will provide cluster munitions to Ukraine, national security adviser Jake Sullivan said Friday, vowing the U.S. will not leave Ukraine defenseless and asserting that Kyiv has promised to use the controversial weapons carefully.
The decision comes on the eve of the NATO summit in Lithuania, where President Joe Biden is likely to face questions from allies on why the U.S. would send a weapon into Ukraine that more than two-thirds of alliance members have banned because it has a track record for causing many civilian casualties. And it was met with divided reactions from Congress, as some Democrats criticized the plan while a Republican backed it.
The munitions — which are bombs that open in the air and release scores of smaller bomblets — are seen by the U.S. as a way to get Kyiv critically needed ammunition to help bolster its offensive and push through Russian front lines. U.S. leaders debated the thorny issue for months, before Biden made the final decision this week.
The US will provide cluster bombs to Ukraine and defends the delivery of the controversial weapon
President Joe Biden has decided to provide cluster munitions to Ukraine for the war against Russia, even though the United Nations urges the warring countries to avoid using them.apnews.com
A mixed blessing in my opinion. One thing is the Russians get the money of their coin, on the other end, the target is saturated of unexploded devices that will be difficult to decontaminate for the attacker once the objective is taken.
Right, and the further potential downside is that NATO countries which have forsworn it may face internal opinions supporting Ukraine being eroded as the Ukrainians use these shells.
But A Admiral Beez makes a very valid point on this topic. Ukraine will be using these weapons within their own territory. The risk for unexploded devices is against Ukraine's own people. Kyiv seems to think that the benefit is worth the risk.
Let's not get sidetracked by the rhetoric about cluster munitions being bad. Yes, they are and they do cause problems...but they've typically been used either in civil wars (Govt against its own people) or within hostile territory (e.g. JP233 during Desert Storm). This Ukraine situation is entirely different and it should, rightly IMHO, be for Kyiv to decide whether or not to use such weapons within their own legal territory.
I think history will show that this was an unfortunate and counter-productive decision. And however its coloured stateside, the Russian propaganda machine will derive great benefit from it, given that pretty much the whole of Europe now regards their use as a borderline war-crime. What an opportunity to drive a wedge, eh?A mixed blessing in my opinion. One thing is the Russians get the money of their coin, on the other end, the target is saturated of unexploded devices that will be difficult to decontaminate for the attacker once the objective is taken.
I totally agree. Whatever our personal opinions are on the subject, millions of people across Europe have been in support of Ukraine. Moves like this can chip away at the public support which has, to date, swallowed soaring energy costs, increased military spending etc as a worth-while cost. For an American administration that also says it wants Europe to shoulder its military responsibilities, its not a clever move IMHO.Right, and the further potential downside is that NATO countries which have forsworn cluster rounds may face internal opinions supporting Ukraine being eroded as the Ukrainians use these shells. I'm thinking particularly of Germany. And though Russia has already deployed them, further use will only make cleanup longer and costlier.
The big plus will be the ability to clear Russian fortifications hidden in tree lines. Currently the only way to clear them now is for the Ukrainians to drive up in IFVs under cover of artillery, dismount and fight at close quarters from dugout to dugout. With 155mm cluster shells the process should be much safer, with drones finding the Russian dugouts and artillery wiping out larger swaths of tree line with a few cluster bomb shells, with the benefit that Russian mines and IEDs can be detonated as well. After that the AFU infantry need just walk up, destroy any surviving forces and move forward.True, and it's their call. I'm simply looking at the pluses and minuses.
That's an excellent article!Ukraine Update: Russia doesn't have a backup plan when it runs out of artillery
Joseph Stalin supposedly once called artillery “the God of War.” Regardless of the historicity of the comment, it gets at a certain truth about the Russian and Soviet armies since well before the time of Napoleon: Artillery has been, and continues to...www.dailykos.com