Okay, so I make ONE effin' comment that dissents from the circle jerk this 1153 page thread already is and I get piled on by people telling ME to "keep it civil" and "no politics"? Seriously people. Check YOURSELVES. This entire thread is one sided political pile of dung. However, if it continues to give some of you a slight bulge in your pants, be my guest. I'm not into attempting to have a logical conversation with a bunch of brick walls.
Have fun and enjoy. I won't be looking here.
This isn't addressed to the OP (he joins the previously lonely other Billy-No-Marks on my 'ignore list). I find the above bit of butt-hurt self-indulgence quite illuminating - from the scatological straight through to the sexual metaphor, mixed like an inept DJ, before verbally butting head-first into the inevitable brick wall (one which hides a little trap-door which he can slip though to the safety of a world in which he'll no longer be challenged). And of course, its
everyone else not being logical. Grapple with that, lol!
Its for the best he doesn't carry on looking here. Youtube will be a much more fertile ground for the kind of confirmation bias he's looking for
Back to reality (or at least a decent comparison!) and contrary to the hissy-fit, it seems to me that there's been
quite a lot of non partisan disagreement and breadth of opinion across this thread. It also seems to me that people seem to come from a pretty wide range of [banned P word] backgrounds and opinions. That a bunch of people who clearly disagree about a range of issues actually agree on the overarching issue of support for Ukraine probably indicates something. I don't know which most powerfully: That they have at least a grasp of global geo-politics? A grasp of history? A grasp of empathy and common humanity? People with a reasonable balance of intellect and background knowledge?
Its strange, because I had nearly posted a question about the dual dangers of isolationism and appeasement last week. And on que, up pops a poster boy to introduce the point I was considering making:
Is anyone aware of a single historical example to show where a nationalist, expansionist, aggressive power or demagogue has EVER been 'bought off' or successfully body-swerved by being either indulged, dissuaded or punished by hurty-words or disapproval, rather than direct resistance? From the wergild of the Saxons to the Vikings, to the Munich Agreement - have their been any exceptions where being supposedly penny-wise hasn't cost far, far more in blood and treasure in the mid to long term? When has apathetically sitting behind defences or an ocean, ignoring the fate of a nation that has values similar to yours at the hands of an aggressive thief of land; lives and wealth,
actually worked? Has disengagement and a unwillingness in the face of a clear wrong to make some sort of sacrifice ever become the best policy of a power that claims any kind of global ethical leadership or aspiration?
The invasion and war in the Ukraine sets an absolute precedence for the entire globe. Metaphorically eating cheese in a backyard bunker whilst re-arranging a 'bug out bag' and polishing your AR15(s), muttering about elites, paedophiles, and a whattaboutery-worldview set largely on youtube, or Truth Social doesn't look like the pathway to either national greatness, justice for Ukraine or world peace.
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l8IkbCeZ9to