Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Is superior Russian emergency beacon system. 4 times better than NATO puppet's system.Some info about the three SU-3x shot down. Russians seem to deny Ukrainians any shoot-down, claim only one a/c lost and even that by friendly fire. But why are there active emergency beacons from at least four pilots?
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XLLfE_60_o0
Some info about the three SU-3x shot down. Russians seem to deny Ukrainians any shoot-down, claim only one a/c lost and even that by friendly fire. But why are there active emergency beacons from at least four pilots?
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XLLfE_60_o0
Definitely not. I hate having to interfere with discussions, let alone having to thread-ban or even fully ban users. Every time we have to ban someone, it feels like something failed.
I admire the cold, business like methods.Militarily that may make sense. The challenge is, the women can shoot too.
A noble example, but how many artillery shells would Denmark have? ten, maybe twenty thousand?Announcing the artillery donation, she said: "Ukraine is asking us for ammunition and artillery now. We, Denmark, have decided to transfer all our artillery to Ukraine. So, sorry, friends, there is military equipment in Europe, it is not only a matter of production.
"We have weapons, ammunition, air defence systems, which we do not use yet. They must be handed over to Ukraine."
Anton Gerashchenko, former Advisor to Internal Affairs Minister for Ukraine, responded on X: "Thank you, Denmark!
France was out of the integrated NATO command in 1966.While not disagreeing with your post you are aware that France has not been a full NATO member sense the 1950's.
They do contribute to the defense of western Europe, but IMO they should not be held to the same spending comparisons of a full NATO member.
Just my opinion others may vary.
Obviously I and no one on the Forum has any idea of the numbers. However, in some ways that isn't the point. The point is that they are willing to give everything they have, and rely on production to make up any shortfall. If other countries including the UK did that, the situation might change in short time.A noble example, but how many artillery shells would Denmark have? ten, maybe twenty thousand?
I don't believe Avdiivka was critically strategic, notwithstanding the italics below. And Russia took over 30,000 casualties.
Some info on what the Czechs have found.Obviously I and no one on the Forum has any idea of the numbers. However, in some ways that isn't the point. The point is that they are willing to give everything they have, and rely on production to make up any shortfall. If other countries including the UK did that, the situation might change in short time.