"All of Vlad's forces and all of Vlad's men, are out to put Humpty together again."

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

They did just did a 1 to 10 stock split. If you had 100 shares at business close last Friday(?), you will have 1000 shares by end of business day Monday/Tuesday and you'll still have the same percentage of ownership of the company.
 
Ukraine is popping Radars and SAMs in Crimea for months/years. With their threat to pop the Kerch bridge they force the russian to replenish/rebuild these sites again and again, weakening other sectors and providing new targets every month.

Also interesting to know would be how they got the naval drones into the Sea of Azov. Do they really pass the Kerch strait at sea, dropped by big drones at night or let loose by partisans?
 
Just looked NVDA up and they are not only climbing (up 150% year to date) they have overtaken Apple as the world biggest company - all thanks to selling truckloads to Putin.

1718009437228.png
 

View attachment 782547
I can't understand the rationale behind anouncing this kind of things all over the place.
 
The Biden Administration's limited policy change permitting Ukraine to use US-provided weapons to strike some Russian military targets in a small area within Russian territory has reduced the size of Russia's ground sanctuary by only 16 percent at maximum. US policy still preserves at least 84 percent of Russia's ground sanctuary – territory within range of Ukrainian ATACMS. US policy restricting Ukraine's usage of US-provided weapons has effectively created a vast sanctuary – territory in range of US-provided weapons but that Ukrainian forces are not allowed strike with US-provided weapons – which Russia exploits to shield its combat forces, command and control, logistics, and rear area support services that the Russian military uses to conduct its military operations in Ukraine.[1] US policy still protects the vast majority of Russia's operational rear and deep rear, and US policy forbids Ukraine from using ATACMS anywhere in Russia.[2] US President Joe Biden's limited policy change in late May 2024 regarding the use of US-provided weapons against military targets in Russia removed at maximum 16 percent of Russia's ground sanctuary, assuming that Ukrainian forces can strike all legitimate Russian military targets in range of Ukrainian HIMARS using GMLRS in Belgorod, Kursk, and Bryansk oblasts. It is far from clear that Ukrainian forces have permission to do so, however. Senior US officials have described Ukraine's ability to strike into Russia with GMLRS as being for counterbattery fire and geographically bounded to the Kharkiv area, and have stated that Ukrainian forces may strike Russian military objects "deployed just across the [Ukrainian] border," suggesting that Ukraine may be prohibited from striking Russian military targets further in the rear or in other areas in Kursk and Bryansk oblasts that are still in range of GMLRS.[3] US officials' statements also indicate that Ukrainian forces may be constrained from striking Russian military targets that are not actively involved in ground attacks and strikes against Ukraine.[4] The reduction of the sanctuary space's area may be less than 16 percent, therefore.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back