"All of Vlad's forces and all of Vlad's men, are out to put Humpty together again." (14 Viewers)

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules


Add to that the 36 planned nuclear reactors, although that may take from 5 years to a decade and maybe not all are actually built.
Bulgaria 2
Czech Republic 4
France 6
Hungary 2
Poland 12 <--- going from 0 to 12. Considering its east neighbor, anyone guessing that, if the Eurobomb gets nowhere, Poland will get its own Bomb withing a decade?
Slovenia 1
Ukraine 7
UK 2
 
Greg Boeser said:
In Europe the Greens (another shade of red) have successfully shamed everyone into abandoning nuclear.
Click to expand...
Mostly Germans and Italians.

Speaking of reds and Greens. It is known that during the soviet union times, Euro greens and Euro left parties where infiltrated/manipulated against anything nuclear. In the same way that Russia is now manipulating antieuropeist right wing parties against a common European project. Some things never change.
 
Last edited:
Thumpalumpacus said:
Pretty sure they can build their own by now.
Click to expand...
As already mentioned, both the UK and France have their own, locally developed/maintained, nuclear capability that does not rely on US involvement. Sweden has previously investigated developing its own. I am pretty sure the likes of Ukraine and Poland are looking into it as well. The technology is certainly within European capabilities.
 
re disposal of radioactive waste

Radioactive contaminates can be filtered out of water - but it costs money. We already have the technology and do this sometimes to harvest radioactive materiel from ocean-water.

Transporting the highly radioactive solid waste materiel is really the only mechanical stumbling block to disposal.

Mariana, Tonga, Kuril-Kamatcha, Philippine, and Kermadec Trenches are all deep-sea subduction zones. Dumping the solid and significantly heavier-than-water material (whether inherently solid and heavier-than-water or encased in concrete and suchlike) into the Trenches would result in the materiel slowly returning to the area below the Earth's crust in a million years or so with no risk to anyone (except maybe some deep sea lifeforms that live in the trenches). Godzilla would presumably be safe.

This has been suggested several times over the last 60 years or so but, here in the US at least, deciding who is going to pay for the transport is a political football, and getting international agreement on anything is almost impossible. The non-government owned energy companies are not willing to foot the bill.

There is also the question of corruption - how do we make sure the contracted agency actually dumps the materiel where they are supposed to?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 15 (members: 2, guests: 13)

Similar threads

M
Horizon Continues Development of Hybrid VTOL
Replies
0
Views
202
MIflyer
M
N
JF-17 are they worth it and can they hold their own?
Replies
4
Views
1K
RogerdeLluria
R
A
The coming $26 billion windfall for the Canadian Armed Forces. What to buy?
6 7 8
Replies
141
Views
17K
swampyankee
Bust The Dragons Jaw! An interesting read on the development and use of the first laser guided bombs in Vietnam.
Replies
7
Views
2K
syscom3
T
Asking help in determining year of Chinese military video
Replies
4
Views
1K
Weizenbrot
W
Menu
Log in
Register