Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Yep - war and war-zones suck - especially for civilians.
Regards
Jagdflieger
Entirely agree, although there's a world of difference between deliberate targeting of military capabilities and civilians being caught inadvertently and what we're seeing in Ukraine. The long-range bombardment of civilian apartment blocks in multiple cities, "shoot first and forget about asking later" engagements by combat vehicles against civilian vehicles, attacking hospital facilities....those are not the actions of a military that's seeking to minimize civilian casualties. They're the actions of a military that fundamentally doesn't understand how to wage war except by total annihilation. It's dishonorable, immoral, and entirely contrary to any established norms for most militaries over the past 75 years.
There is nothing new about this - Large scale killing of civilians was always part and parcel of the Russian armies playbook.
Not to question your numeracy, but are you sure you have the right war? China aside, WWII did kick off in Europe and I don't believe anyone used chemical weapons.If WWII had kicked off in Europe, it was always expected the Russians would use chemical weapons
It is a head scratcher. What could be the strategy here?Which brings us back to the total lack of logical planning for the invasion of Ukraine. If you're planning to liberate an oppressed people, you don't do it by deliberately killing them..
There was a new "invasion" in the past few days. In the post offices of Belarus. Returning troops sent parcels to their home places across the Russian Federation. Belarus opposition managed to obtain some shipments' data. Hundreds of kilograms per person...Speaking of war crimes, looting of prisoners and/or bodies is also a war crime:
Very informative about Putin's miscalculation and misunderstanding.Excellent briefing. Highly recommended to anyone who wants to understand the roots of this war.
Entirely agree, although there's a world of difference between deliberate targeting of military capabilities and civilians being caught inadvertently and what we're seeing in Ukraine. The long-range bombardment of civilian apartment blocks in multiple cities, "shoot first and forget about asking later" engagements by combat vehicles against civilian vehicles, attacking hospital facilities....those are not the actions of a military that's seeking to minimize civilian casualties. They're the actions of a military that fundamentally doesn't understand how to wage war except by total annihilation. It's dishonorable, immoral, and entirely contrary to any established norms for most militaries over the past 75 years.
I for one am getting pretty tired of these posts. There have been several in this vane and so I feel that I need to pipe up.
I abhor what is going on in Ukraine and have no doubt that there are clear cases to be made for war crimes charges against many individuals. However, I reject the allusion to guilt by association that underlies this and other posts that you've made and would suggest that it's exactly this kind of argument that Putin used as justification to invade Ukraine in the first place. The sober consideration of facts and the presumption of innocence until guilt is proven is what separates we who hold the rule of law sacrosanct from the flagrant abusers of international order.
History books are FULL of examples of generalized hatred and the resulting horrors. It's time we learned.
Looks like things are happening on the tanks.The U.S. will help allies move Soviet-made tanks to Ukraine in an effort to assist the country in protecting its Donbas region amid the Russian invasion, The New York Times reported Friday.
Looks like things are happening on the tanks.
Brilliant.I have to think the Ukrainians have one of the best MiG-29 paint schemes.
View attachment 663818
Might they want some invasion stripes under the wing to avoid friendly AA fire?
I have to think the Ukrainians have one of the best MiG-29 paint schemes.
View attachment 663818
Might they want some invasion stripes under the wing to avoid friendly AA fire?
At 0:12, is that a T-72 minus ERA? I thought it looked like an old T-62.I hope this is accurate. If so, I'd support pulling any older M1s we have in mothballs for refurbishment and backfilling the Czech arms.
NATO doesn't have a National insignia for aircraft per se. I can't think of a more uniting symbol for its planes.I have to think the Ukrainians have one of the best MiG-29 paint schemes.
View attachment 663818
Might they want some invasion stripes under the wing to avoid friendly AA fire?
At 0:12, is that a T-72 minus ERA? I thought it looked like an old T-62i.
Does Peru still have its twenty-odd MiG-29s? I'm sure a US security guarantee would free those up for a five stage transatlantic flight. Plus the US could send all its MiG-29s. Throw in the Polish ones and that's three or four squadrons worth. But damn it, the West needs to hurry, Russian offensive 2.0 will begin within the next 10 days or so.
At 0:12, is that a T-72 minus ERA? I thought it looked like an old T-62.
Does Peru still have its twenty-odd MiG-29s? I'm sure a US security guarantee would free those up for a five stage transatlantic flight. Plus the US could send all its MiG-29s. Throw in the Polish ones and that's three or four squadrons worth. But damn it, the West needs to hurry, Russian offensive 2.0 will begin within the next 10 days or so.