"All of Vlad's forces and all of Vlad's men, are out to put Humpty together again." (7 Viewers)

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

There are no Cyrillic words, only Cyrillic letters. And there are Bulgarian, Russian, Polish and other words of various Slavic languages written in Cyrillic, Latin or other alphabet. Is it so hard to understand the difference between alphabet and language?
 
There are no Cyrillic words, only Cyrillic letters. And there are Bulgarian, Russian, Polish and other words of various Slavic languages written in Cyrillic, Latin or other alphabet. Is it so hard to understand the difference between alphabet and language?
Ahh, ok, I get it - Slavic languages are all the same, just different alphabets.

Thanks for explaining that.
 
Ahh, ok, I get it - Slavic languages are all the same, just different alphabets.

Thanks for explaining that.

Other way around -- the languages are different, but use the same alphabet (more or less) -- much like French and English use the same alphabet, and even share cognates, but are quite different languages.

Slavic languages are related, like English and German are, or to a lesser extent English and French, but what little I know about Slavic languages tells me that they are definitely not the same, just as English and German aren't the same. All these languages are evolutionary codescendants from one tongue or another. As they evolve, they differentiate. For instance, Latin has three major daughter languages: Italian, Spanish, and French. They all use essentially the same alphabet, and share many if not most of the same cognates (think word roots/word origins/concepts), but are separate languages. I'm pretty sure Polish, Russian, Hungarian, and so on are in that sort of basket,

It's probably easier for a Pole to learn Russian than it would be for you or me, because the languages have a closer evolution.

Indeed, in linguistics, we can sometimes estimate the date of separation by the amount of differences, much like being able to estimate the closeness of a biological clade by the similarity of its DNA.
 
Last edited:
Other way around -- the languages are different, but use the same alphabet (more or less)
Bingo! Moreover, some Slavic languages use different alphabets - for example, Belarusian originally had Cyrillic alphabet, then there were variants of writing with Latin alphabet (based on Polish) and even Arabic(!!!) - when a part of Crimean Tatars moved to the Grand Duchy of Lithuania.
 
The point I had originally intended, before this became a circle-jerk, is that of the spoken language based on the people who use the Cyrillic alphabet: (Bulgarians, Ukrainians, Russians, etc.), the Bulgarian accent is much softer than Russian.

That was my point.
 
It's probably easier for a Pole to learn Russian than it would be for you or me, because the languages have a closer evolution.
You'd be surprised at how easy Bulgarian was to learn.

The difficulty I had, though, is learning to roll the back of the tongue as opposed to the Latin/Germanic style of rolling the tip of the tongue.

Like all things, it just takes practice.
 
You'd be surprised at how easy Bulgarian was to learn.

The difficulty I had, though, is learning to roll the back of the tongue as opposed to the Latin/Germanic style of rolling the tip of the tongue.

Like all things, it just takes practice.

There are Latin cognates in Slavic languages too, and I can recognize them even in Russian, which was least influenced by the Roman Empire. It gets confusing when we start thinking about transported words, where modern English words with Latin roots are adopted by other languages.

I'll take your word on how to work your tongue. The gals I've known don't seem to mind American Southern dialect.
 
Spoken Cyrillic...
iv.gif

I don't get it: either Poles and Czechs are no longer Slavs, or they communicate with each other in writing only.

PS. F..., how many new and interesting things you can learn about the philology of Slavic languages from those who don't speak them.
 
There are Latin cognates in Slavic languages too, and I can recognize them even in Russian, which was least influenced by the Roman Empire. It gets confusing when we start thinking about transported words, where modern English words with Latin roots are adopted by other languages.

I'll take your word on how to work your tongue. The gals I've known don't seem to mind American Southern dialect.
Well, being a native Southern Californian, Spanish comes easy, so when I was learning Bulgarian, I kept trying to "roll" my R's as if I was saying "rojas", "rapido", etc.
My sweetheart, Rozitsa (Rosi/Роси for short) was very patient. She said make a "grrrrrr" sound and feel your tongue, then let air travel through your nose. This is how you do it.

by God, it worked.
 
Spoken Cyrillic...
View attachment 835387
I don't get it: either Poles and Czechs are no longer Slavs, or they communicate with each other in writing only.

PS. F..., how many new and interesting things you can learn about the philology of Slavic languages from those who don't speak them.
Aparently you missed my point I was making to another member and feel that you have to dwell on the subject.

My point (again and again and again) is that the Bulgarian accent is softer to the ear than that of a person speaking Russian.

Now can we PLEASE get back on topic?
 
Ok, so when one reads Cyrillic words out loud, what language are they speaking?
питам за приятел
As said above: there are no Cyrillic words. There are languages that use the Cyrillic alphabet to write words from that language. The Cyrillic alphabet is associated with some, but not all, Slavic languages.

As an aside, not all European languages are that closely related. Most European languages are Indo-European, but Basque, Finnish, Saami, Hungarian are not.
 
The point I had originally intended, before this became a circle-jerk, is that of the spoken language based on the people who use the Cyrillic alphabet: (Bulgarians, Ukrainians, Russians, etc.), the Bulgarian accent is much softer than Russian.

That was my point.
Funny how a statement like this gets out of hand quickly on the internet :lol:

Let's go back on topic :)
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back