Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
The main issue is just how many Tomahawks the U.S has in active inventory.
... and the shilly-shally begins:
President Trump during a White House meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said it is not "easy" for the U.S. to give long-range Tomahawk cruise missiles to Ukraine, as Washington needs the powerful munitions in its stockpile also.
"It's not easy for us to give … you're talking about massive numbers of very powerful weapons," Trump said Friday.
"So, that's one of the things we'll be talking about hopefully, they won't need it, hopefully, we'll be able to get the war over with, without thinking about Tomahawks," he added at the White House.
The possible delivery of Tomahawk missiles has become a major point of discussion this week after Trump floated the idea.
and more of the "say something...get attention...have no intent to actually deliver...make up excuses when challenged...move to next distraction and attention grabber...repeat..."Yeah...I saw the equivocation, too. He also said giving Ukraine Tomahawks "could mean bigger escalation, a lot of bad things can happen."
Once again, we're seeing inconsistency and lack of clarity...plus a dose of cowardice thrown in.
Strikes yes, but I'm looking forward to seeing Ukraine recapture large swaths of territory. Ukraine needs to break the Surovkin line and get to Crimea. Easily said granted, but that has to be the plan for 2026-2027.Ukrainian strikes in 3...2...1...