I think it is healthy to take a different view. You do and that is a good thing. However Russia is not the soviet union, even if a guy thinks he still can fill Uncle Joe shoes. That much is very clear.
The weapons fielded are not enough, planning is even shorter then that of Adolf. Supplies are long away and costly to get to the front. And that if ! available.
Cant take a big city, yes murder or rape some to terrorize as they did in well, every where to went too. ( they are not the only ones with this strategy i know )
Can take a bit of dirt but shaky on keeping it.
The other side did get get some heavy stuff after all and a lot of very mobile manpads and (i presume, i agree) a very nice dose of info on where and how many enemy agents are where in real time. And are getting better suited weapons although not the latest in ever more faster pase. This war isnt about how many one can produce to overwhelm the other. There is no time to do that. It isnt ww2 Ost front. Its a fight at best for Russia a stalemate, a powerplay that went over the intended goal. Should have been a blitzkrieg covering a piece of real estate, put your guys in control over the rest and Bob is your Uncle. Did it before ( forgetting Afghanistan as everybody should)
Why didt Putin play Risk? Cant hold the whole of the continent not even for 7 tokens.
That does not take away the force Russia can field, it just shows how it can do in an offensive war AND keeping its hinterland.
It cant.
Again it is not the soviet union nor does it has for a few years unlimited forces
So i hope you do better next time in claiming stuff. I do mean i like a different view but in a hot war, you state sources if you state some thing as the truth.
Not some article written almost nobody knows.
As I mentioned I am separating two issues - The initial attack in February, and the war that has been going on since end of March.
The issue I was referring to is the one since end of March. so some Wiki unit summarizing article regarding the war in February is of no interest to me.
I am and was also referring to units in combat with the Ukrainian armed forces - not to logistic or reserve units being held back or operating behind the front line.
If e.g. 130 Russian BTG's = 100,000 men would be in combat since end of March - or the other reported 94 BGT's = (75,000men) then automatically at least to me, the question arises how many of these BTG's are actually composed of units from the 1st and 2nd LDNR Army corps (integrated into the 8th Russian army) since 2nd March
.
e.g. : originating from a confidential report on February 11th 2022 regarding Draft-notices for the LDNR: - That's what they're doing right now — they're delivering the draft notices to apartments and homes. I don't know the exact number of the notices, but I think we are talking about 50,000-60,000 people.
The LDNR units had already a strength of more then 140,000 in 2020. So add 50-60,000 people and add e.g. a probable but unknown figure for 2021 and you come up easily with ca. 200,000 men. One also needs to recall that the "civil war" conducted between the Putin termed (Nazi/fascist Ukraine units) and the LDNR units has been ongoing since 2014.
Therefore the Moscow Times article from February 2nd mentions that the LDNR needs to be at 100,000. - in 2015!!
How many Russian troops supported these LDNR units from 2014 to 2022 I wouldn't be able to place a reliable figure.
As for your comparison with WWII - as you know that doesn't stick much, since those territories 80 years ago did not behold hundreds of villages and towns nowadays existing along the front-line and throughout the Ukraine. Also the Ukrainian forces have logically fortified their positions heavily since 2014.
So that e.g. 130 BTG's or 100,000 men or 95 BTG's (75,000men) "including the LDNR units" are only able to make slow or almost no significant progress toward the Ukrainian lines since April is understood. - at least to me.
Therefore my statement; less then 50,000 Russian soldiers are temporarily engaged in combat - with another 100,000 being assembled that will be brought into action.
Since NATO or the media ignores the existence of the LDNR units (but only refers to Russian or BTG's) when it comes to combat numbers, I will logically leave it up to the individual
to make up his own mind or assumptions towards the actual composition of these "Russian units".
On 3rd of March, the LDNR units "claimed" the liberation of around 120 villages, towns and areas (not the Russian army) this was also reported on by the western media - so one can not claim/forward that an LDNR wouldn't exist, or that all conquering was done solely by Russian units.