Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
The young ones, like every other young adult in the world with a smart phone or web access and a VPN know the truth. That's going to be Putin's problem, he can't as easily control the minds of his subjects.Except your citizens are never told the truth.
And keep in mind that even so-called reliable sites are susceptible to confirmation bias, agenda-pushing and suppressing inconvenient information that is counter-narrative.
It won't be a tactical nuke, but I wouldn't rule out a chemical weapon attack. Of course the prevailing wind would send any large strike straight into the Donbas region. A smaller chemical attack, like we saw in Iraq or Syria can't really be considered a WMD attack.
What would the reaction of the US and NATO be in this case? There's still no Article 5 to fall back on. My guess is some NATO members would want to march into Ukraine right up to the pre-Feb 2022 borders, whilst others will want to do nothing.
Except your citizens are never told the truth.
The journalist "spotted" the Admiral Makarov, but where are the other two?Maybe were finally have an answer...
A Journalist Just Spotted Russia's 'Admiral Makarov' Frigate, Intact And At Sea
But he has been brainwashing them for years so that they believe he is the only one telling the truth - just like the Chinese and PumpThe young ones, like every other young adult in the world with a smart phone or web access and a VPN know the truth. That's going to be Putin's problem, he can't as easily control the minds of his subjects.
The journalist "spotted" the Admiral Makarov, but where are the other two?
Interesting article hereThe young ones, like every other young adult in the world with a smart phone or web access and a VPN know the truth. That's going to be Putin's problem, he can't as easily control the minds of his subjects.