Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
You couldn't have made this stuff up. If anyone said before the invasion started, that the Russian Air Force would rely on basic low grade civilian GPS, I would have wanted to know what they were smoking.Not sure if it has been previously discussed here. Being an aircraft forum maybe even in another thread. But it's certainly puzzling me.
Russian Mig-29 with civilian GPS attached
View attachment 667851
Russian Su-34 with civilian Garmin entry level GPS
View attachment 667852
Russian Su-25SM3 with another civilian Garmin GPS
View attachment 667853
Maybe something like thisSo what does Russia have in mind in the way of "future reprisals" for Poland, a "special operation" to root out Nazis there, too?
I'm pretty sure Poland isn't going to lose any sleep over Russia's threats.
As far as I know the su-34 picture is from the Syrian war, and maybe the su-25 too. But somebody else reported that civilian GPS have been found on the wreckage of some Russian planes in Ukraine too.You couldn't have made this stuff up. If anyone said before the invasion started, that the Russian Air Force would rely on basic low grade civilian GPS, I would have wanted to know what they were smoking.
The SU34 cockpit looks quite modern.
I think the key word is highlighted have in mind in the way of "future reprisals" for Poland,So what does Russia have in mind in the way of "future reprisals" for Poland, a "special operation" to root out Nazis there, too?
I'm pretty sure Poland isn't going to lose any sleep over Russia's threats.
Any military ship belonging to belligerent nations that are not registered to the Black Sea prior to the start of hostilities, are not allowed passage under Artical 19, however, Turkey currently will not allow any warships to transit the straights.Out of curiosity, would an amphibious assault ship be banned from the Black Sea by Turkey? A few nations classify ships that look like aircraft carriers as cruisers or destroyers of some sort even though V/STOL combat aircraft operate from them. I'm sure that has something to do with the future submarine Kusnetsov classification by Russia.
Out of curiosity, would an amphibious assault ship be banned from the Black Sea by Turkey? A few nations classify ships that look like aircraft carriers as cruisers or destroyers of some sort even though V/STOL combat aircraft operate from them. I'm sure that has something to do with the future submarine Kusnetsov classification by Russia.
According to the Montreux Convention, unless NATO being at war the total tonnage of warships by non-belligerent parties to enter the Black-Sea can't exceed 15,000 tonnes.Out of curiosity, would an amphibious assault ship be banned from the Black Sea by Turkey? A few nations classify ships that look like aircraft carriers as cruisers or destroyers of some sort even though V/STOL combat aircraft operate from them. I'm sure that has something to do with the future submarine Kusnetsov classification by Russia.
Everyone can buy their own Su-34 today. A piece of, I mean.There super dupers strike aircraft is the SU-34
Two shot wrecks examined had domestic satnavs fixed to the cockpit surround.
The crappy Russian nav system doesn't work or is so unreliable it cant find Ukraine
Russia Stronk!
May we add:I think the key word is highlighted have in mind in the way of "future reprisals" for Poland,
There will have to be an order of priority, as Putin now has Future reprisals for
Poland,
Finland and Sweden (almost certainly)
Australia
Japan (for increasing its Navy and operating around some disputed islands)
UK
Rest of Europe
I don't think he has actually threatened the USA, but he has enough to be going on with and I don't think the others are quaking in their boots
So....... if we want to get the UNF a submarine or three, this is the only way....The Montreux Convention prevents any combat vessel belonging to a belligerent at war from entering the Black Sea unless the vessel's home port is there. So any Russian Naval vessel should be prevented from entering.
I love that song.Loving the last quote from the Finnish President:
Finnish President Sauli Niinisto was asked about whether his country joining Nato would provoke Russia.
He reminded the press conference that this was "not the first time we are discussing Nato".
"In the end of last year they [Russia] stated that Finland and Sweden can't join Nato – they demanded that Nato doesn't take new members," he says.
The Finish president said this changed the picture as Russia was stating that Finland and Sweden did not have their "own will", and the Russian invasion on 24 February also changes the picture.
"They are ready to attack their neighbouring country, so... my response would be that 'you caused this – look at the mirror'," he says.
For those not tracking, UK PM Boris Johnson is visiting Sweden and Finland today to put in place agreements whereby the UK agrees to to cooperate militarily with either nation if they're attacked, including providing military forces. These agreements are being put in place to cover the period of transition if either Sweden or Finland decide to join NATO. Essentially, it means the UK is providing security guarantees to both nations until they come under the NATO umbrella.
That video doesn't show that.effectiveness
There is no context to the video posted.i think scoring direct hit of the BMP running at full speed shown on movie it is something requiring lot more than just lucky day, especially that it wasn't just sole example but it was at least 4 vehicles hit with similar precision
It might if the U.S. and the U.K. loaned a couple of ASW and anti-aircraft frigates.According to the Montreux Convention, unless NATO being at war the total tonnage of warships by non-belligerent parties to enter the Black-Sea can't exceed 15,000 tonnes.
So theoretically the USA could send and "lend" an amphibious war ship to Ukraine - but I don't think it would be long afloat if used by the Ukrainians.
Probably some lawyers might get rich in that processWhat I really wanted to know was, does an amphibious assault ship circumvent the no aircraft carrier rule?
I don't think there's a problem. The first 3 pictures are obviously of buses. No problem.So....... if we want to get the UNF a submarine or three, this is the only way....
View attachment 667884
View attachment 667885
View attachment 667886
I jest of course, but more seriously Narco-type midget subs could be shipped overland. It's too bad the Ukrainians didn't keep up maintenance on their single Foxtrot class, and asked to buy Romania's Kilo while they're at it. It all comes down to money of course. The last picture above is of an Upholder/Victoria class SSK, I bet the Ukrainians could put those four 1980s boats to better use than the RCN.
View attachment 667887
The no aircraft carrier rule is not part of the formal terms.What I really wanted to know was, does an amphibious assault ship circumvent the no aircraft carrier rule?