"All of Vlad's forces and all of Vlad's men, are out to put Humpty together again." (4 Viewers)

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

I wonder what Russians think of the peaceful (POTUS45's nonsense aside) transition of power in the US. Since Putin came to power in 1999 the USA has had five Presidents. Do Russian's see this as weakness or strength?
As nonsense, as political theatre. As something unnecessary and potentially dangerous for their country. I don't remember polls with exactly this question, but other polls make me think so.
 
Which hypersonics are you referring to? Because they have used Kh-47s against Ukraine.
Yes, when Kremlin's propaganda outlets brag about the hypersonic weapon in service, usually they mean Kinzhal - ballistic Iskander modified for aerial launch. They call it hyper-sonic because it exceeds Mach 5... As the original Iskander, as most, if not all, other ballistic missiles, starting with German A-4(V-2) and including Tochka-U which is still being used by Ukrainian Army.
 
Perhaps the scum sucker will get to taste Putinaide.
 
Last edited:

On the other hand, you don't have the diversity of opinion that might save a country from an "oops" moment.
 
That's rather a loaded piece of rhetoric there.
China has put in 'historical' territorial claims against around 21 different countries including Russia (140,000 sq km's including Vladivostok), all of Vietnam,
both North and South Korea, Northern Laos, North Eastern India, the Spratley Islands, Taiwan of course, Islands off Japan including at one stage, Okinawa
and so on. There is also the claim to the whole of the South China Sea which goes against all international treaties, agreements etc.

The real problem for China now is economic. All the major tech companies are moving out as fast as they can. Heavy industries are moving out as well.
The buying and selling of property where no one lives has created a huge increase in prices which cannot be sustained and is not a bursting bubble but
more like a balloon that has so many holes it leaks out faster than the air can go in.

All this is the stuff that can create a panic in the upper controllers leading to irrational moves. I hope it evens out before it gets that far.
 

I'm not arguing that China isn't being grabby. I'm suggesting that the loaded language of that article seems to be strong indicator of bias.
 
I'm not arguing that China isn't being grabby. I'm suggesting that the loaded language of that article seems to be strong indicator of bias.
Absolutely but here in Australia I have also heard on radio and television from Australian journalists that China categorically has only one claim
and that is Taiwan. No mention of the others.

It's a real push and pull in India as I have friends from there who have explained the complex state system and how there are some who support socialist views
so they support China and others who are opposites. Vive la difference ?
 

True but Aus media is really parochial much of the time so I also look at US and European media to get a better view. Until about a year ago I also looked at an NZ site but they have gone all waka and now insist on putting as many neoMaori words in every article as they can get away with and that just makes their articles unreadable.

Was a great site before that and often covered Aus stories that the Aus media refused to cover or hid where search engines could not find them.
 
I do wonder how China is affording its massive military expansion. It's not as if they can sell debt to the West, and we're pulling a lot of offshore consumer goods manufacturing to elsewhere.

But I'm clearly taking us off topic. So I'll say no more on China outside of Ukraine war context.



I'll conclude by saying that if through its abject failure to defeat Ukraine and its new reputation for shoddy military kit and prowess Russia is perceived as weak, China will become more grabby. Likely before 2030.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread