Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Great. Like I don't have enough trouble sleeping already.I'm thinking that with the growing collapse of the Russian misadventures in Ukraine, could Putler get tempted to break out the nukes? Especially considering that a certain funeral would make a very major target for a decapitation strike...
He may be stupid but lets hope he's not dumbI'm thinking that with the growing collapse of the Russian misadventures in Ukraine, could Putler get tempted to break out the nukes? Especially considering that a certain funeral would make a very major target for a decapitation strike...
I'm way more worried about crazy.He may be stupid but lets hope he's not dumb
Helmet? yes. Rest of the uniform and gear? Not even close.Two questions for our resident tankers.
First: looking at this pic of russian equipment captured I noticed that the tank crew helmet is the same model that I got my hands on (albeit that one with NVG) as a young teenager some 30 years ago when going with my father to former USSR ships in Tenerife to be cambulloneros (BTW, the only ship I remember was named Khersones and was a school ship). Is the western tank crew equipment the same as 30 years ago?
View attachment 686645
Second: a soft helmet has any advantage over a hard one inside a tank?
That could be an indicator but not a slam dunk depending on how the fuel is being burnt at that moment.Looks like both engines cut out. I didnt see any exhaust at the end before is crashed.
I've seen some Soviet maintenance programs on older equipment, seem comparable to western standards in most respects, BUT hard to say what is being done under combat conditions.RE: the Su-25 video.
Scrimping on scheduled service? How old are those things? Have Russian aircraft had scheduled structural component maintenance similar to western standards? I'm guessing no and I would say the same for their civil aviation.
I've seen similar and the fact that we haven't seen more of the Russian AF proves this point.The latest intel I have run across says that ~25% of the Russian front line aviation is either on a limited flight time allowance (to preserve airframe life) or down for lack of maintenance and spares.
But they will have the basic skills for basic tactical maneuvers like flying in formation and doing multi-ship take offs. If this was a simple IFE, he "should have" had the training to address the situation.Re: The Su-25 pilots may not have the aviating skill level for combat.
From Victor Belenko back in 1976. I think depending what you're doing in Russian military aviation, this may or may not have changed. I've met (and flown) with a few Russian pilots who made their way to the US and their skill level varied. One guy claimed he had several hundred hours in MiG-21s, he could fly good but his formation skills were poor compared to US pilots I've been around. Another guy who flew "various" combat aircraft was sh!t hot.The MiG-25 pilot who defected to Japan said in his book they were lucky to get 10 hours per month in harvest season as the pilots were used to drive the tractors. He was astounded as he was nearly out of fuel, near Japan, to hear a woman's voice in his headset telling him he had 15 minutes of fuel left. None of his fellow pilots knew of this recorded warning. How much has changed?
I'm thinking that with the growing collapse of the Russian misadventures in Ukraine, could Putler get tempted to break out the nukes? Especially considering that a certain funeral would make a very major target for a decapitation strike...
Thanks!Helmet? yes. Rest of the uniform and gear? Not even close.
Not sure on the first question as more modern gear isn't my thing.Two questions for our resident tankers.
First: looking at this pic of russian equipment captured I noticed that the tank crew helmet is the same model that I got my hands on (albeit that one with NVG) as a young teenager some 30 years ago when going with my father to former USSR ships in Tenerife to be cambulloneros (BTW, the only ship I remember was named Khersones and was a school ship). Is the western tank crew equipment the same as 30 years ago?
View attachment 686645
Second: a soft helmet has any advantage over a hard one inside a tank?