ARTESH
Chief Master Sergeant
Naval blockade would be impossible for many reasons! No idea about the meaning of "Aerial Blockade".Is a naval and air blockade of Iran being considered?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Naval blockade would be impossible for many reasons! No idea about the meaning of "Aerial Blockade".Is a naval and air blockade of Iran being considered?
Unconfirmed reports tell 18 K [IA] and 8 W [IA].The only thing Iran has gotten so far, is ten of their own killed last week.
Have sanctions ever worked, maybe South Africa? While screwing up the availability of some arms, sanctions otherwise don't seem to have any impact on Russia's decisions. The best path with Iran is to seize upon the current uprising to pursue regime change. That might end up with someone worse, but the ensuing chaos would at least temporarily disrupt Iran's foreign endeavours.
The US, Britain and France seem to be lining up to levy more sanctions on Tehran due to the sale of drones to Russia. It remains to be seen how deeply/broadly any new sanctions impact the Iranian economy.
If the mighty Russian military has to resort to drones as a means to fight a war, I doubt it could even successfully beat Liechtenstein.
Naval blockade would be impossible for many reasons! No idea about the meaning of "Aerial Blockade".
Sanctions have no impact on regime, but on people!!! the only language they understand is "Violence". I personally support any form of of it, against terrorists, their assets and agents, and families. An explosion in one of their spy nests [embassies], would send them a way more clear message than useless shit talks.
the impact was, is and will be nothing to regime! you just make sanction against 1 person or company, but 1000s other rise up! blowing their money laundry locations or assassination of known terrorists, is way more effective.
Thats exactly what the regime wants!!! an excuse to start a war!!! targeting ships with missiles is possible and an optional approach by IRGC!!! and im pretty sure, no one would ever give them what they want. besides that, any ship can go to pakistan or indian ports and being sent towards iran, by roads.Naval blockade outside the Straits of Hormuz would be possible, but there's no way we can prevent trade between Russia and Iran over the Caspian or even through Azerbaijan and the corridor between the Caspian and Black seas, nor can we prevent trade over the land borders that Iran has.
But a distant blockade conducted in the Arabian Sea could be done, for whatever point that might -- or might not -- have.
and thats one of reasons i say naval blockade is both ineffective and impossible.The mullahs are much more concerned about their own power than they are concerned about the welfare of the people.
I hope that one day Iranians will get a government that actually gives a shit about them.
Thats exactly what the regime wants!!! an excuse to start a war!!! targeting ships with missiles is possible and an optional approach by IRGC!!! and im pretty sure, no one would ever give them what they want. besides that, any ship can go to pakistan or indian ports and being sent towards iran, by roads.
No arguements, at all! just trying to clarify the situation for better understanding what is going on!!!Right. Understand that I'm not arguing for any naval blockade; as I've implied, I am sure it would be pointless by being easily avoided. I was just saying that a naval blockade could be done, useless as it would be given the landward borders and political geography involved.
Drones are an emerging weapon platform, there is no question.I don't think of drones as a "resort", but rather as a logical tool to minimize the life-hazard of fighting a war. In that, the Russians are smart to use drones -- and I think it's safe to say that their successful use of drones is the only bright spot in their otherwise dismal performance in invading Ukraine.
We Americans are moving big time into drone usage as well, including investigating using manned F-35s as AI control ships for a small fleet of UAVs.
Implying that drones are the desperate act of a weak nation is not, therefore, really accurate, in my opinion. Drones will have a secure place in war-fighting in the future.
same thing is happenin, in my country, right now! it would be good for them to do an action! or they'll pay in blood!Only a political gesture, but anyway ....
European Parliament declares Russia a state sponsor of terrorism
The European Parliament on Wednesday designated Russia a state sponsor of terrorism, arguing that its military strikes on Ukrainian civilian targets such as energy infrastructure, hospitals, schools and shelters violated international law.www.reuters.com
With the right kit ex-FAA Sea Kings can pack a punch.Britain sending helicopters to Ukraine for first time - Ben Wallace
Three former Sea King helicopters will be provided and the first has already arrived, the BBC understands.www.bbc.com