"All of Vlad's forces and all of Vlad's men, are out to put Humpty together again." (14 Viewers)

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

 
 
Is the Stryker made by GDLS in Canada? Is it armed, our unarmed like the LAVs Canada donated?
 
Here is a close-up of a BMPT firing (probably for a show-off). Notice the extreme vibration of those guns. I wonder if they can actually hit anything.
One does not want to be at the receiving end of that amount of 30mm fire.

Not a long time ago, we've saw the Su-35 with the R-37 LR AAM, here is the MiG-31 with 4 of these uder the fuselage: picture.
 
Do you know this for a fact? Not sure any military is in the habit of stockpiling weapons they can't use. The weapons have to be maintained, and that's a drain on resources for a resource-constrained military (and the US military absolutely is resource constrained).

Speaking of law, the US cannot legally export cluster munitions unless (a) the weapon has at least a 99% successful detonation rate, and (b) the receiving country can guarantee that they won't be used in areas where there are civilians. The US would have to change its own laws to export cluster munitions to Ukraine.

And all of that ignores international law on the use of cluster weapons. Ukraine use of them would be a propaganda gift to Putin. Also, let's remember that these weapons would be used where Ukrainian civilians still survive and where, hopefully, some degree of normal life may return once the invading orcs are repulsed. Sowing cluster munitions is a recipe for killing a large number of your own population long after the war is over.


Yes, it is fact, its in open source Pentagon paperwork.

Both Ukraine and Russia use cluster munitions in many varieties.
Russian developed cluster munitions have a 30-50% failure rate vs 2% for typical western systems
 
Tech support for the UAF.


Hopefully you're not on hold for an hour listening to polkas and every thirty seconds, "Vash dzvinok vazhlyvyy dlya nas, budʹ laska, zalyshaytesya na liniyi…"

(your call is important to us, please remain on the line…)
 
Last edited:
Speaking of law, the US cannot legally export cluster munitions unless (a) the weapon has at least a 99% successful detonation rate, and (b) the receiving country can guarantee that they won't be used in areas where there are civilians. The US would have to change its own laws to export cluster munitions to Ukraine.
Does that count if Ukraine is using the weapons within its own country?
 
Does that count if Ukraine is using the weapons within its own country?

Here's a snippet from the actual convention on cluster munitions (which has 110 signatories):

1. Each State Party undertakes never under any circumstances to:
(a) Use cluster munitions;
(b) Develop, produce, otherwise acquire, stockpile, retain or transfer to anyone, directly or indirectly, cluster munitions;
(c) Assist, encourage or induce anyone to engage in any activity prohibited to a State Party under this Convention.

2. Paragraph 1 of this Article applies, mutatis mutandis, to explosive bomblets that are specifically designed to be dispersed or released from dispensers affixed to aircraft.


The inclusion of "under any circumstances" suggests that the actual location of use is irrelevant to the convention. Now, that doesn't mean signatories won't use cluster munitions. Like all things UN-related, enforcement is hugely problematic.

To add to the complications, the US, Russia and the Ukraine were not signatories so, theoretically, they can do as they please. However, the export of cluster munitions to one of the belligerents may create antibodies across the international community.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back