"All of Vlad's forces and all of Vlad's men, are out to put Humpty together again." (5 Viewers)

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

Here is a clue. There is a company in the UK (possibly this one) that has supplied a good number of the APC version to Ukraine. This could be a follow up.

I have found the Video that backs up what I read a few months ago

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=emN3LoJMwrE

These systems are probably mainly surplus and/or ex Afghanistan related vehicles aren't they? Its not the company (Alvis?) whos supplying them is it? Don't they actually come from the UKs already ridiculously small reserves? :confused:
 
According to Wiki (yes, I know) there's still over 1,000 Scorpions in service in Africa and South America. Iran has 20 (yep...won't get our hands on those), Nigeria has 150, Oman 120 and Thailand 100. The condition of all these vehicles is unknown and many may be unserviceable. I suspect any bound for Ukraine would require a complete rebuild...but that's just me.
Its all a bit vague and creatively imprecise, isn't it? I don;t know if Alvis or its successor companies have capacity to take on that kind of work on hulls as old and clapped-out as most of those must be, but it would be a difficult thing to try and hide, given we're not a nation at war. And to date, I haven't heard of huge inbound shipments of armoured vehicles, large convoys to and from the docks moving along motorways, or desperate recruitment campaigns by Alvis to get the necessary mechanically skilled manpower together to do it.

I know all is fair in love and war, but I think it will be a great shame if 'our side' is starting to indulge in a regular speculative massaging of facts. If its done subtly, its great. But if its clunky enough that armchair warriors like myself can see how unlikely it is, I very much doubt Ivan is going to be any more taken in than I am. Besides, the Western democracies need to remain scrupulously fact based and credible rather than risk being dragged into Russia ever more ludicrous 'Comical Ali' style of rhetoric and propaganda. Credibility is going to be one of the most strategically important assets of the (mis)information war when it comes to wider world opinion on how this whole mess plays out in the long run.
 
These systems are probably mainly surplus and/or ex Afghanistan related vehicles aren't they? Its not the company (Alvis?) whos supplying them is it? Don't they actually come from the UKs already ridiculously small reserves? :confused:
Clearly they are surplus, but they seem to be a company that works with the government. They did supply Latvia with 120 scorpions so they would have to have access to the basic hulls in significant numbers and have the ability to refurbish and supply them. They have already supplied about eighty vehicles to Ukraine so it would seem achievable.
 
Clearly they are surplus, but they seem to be a company that works with the government. They did supply Latvia with 120 scorpions so they would have to have access to the basic hulls in significant numbers and have the ability to refurbish and supply them. They have already supplied about eighty vehicles to Ukraine so it would seem achievable.
When did the supply of 'Scorpions' take place? As I said, Scorpion has been out of production for decades... ?
 
Clearly they are surplus, but they seem to be a company that works with the government. They did supply Latvia with 120 scorpions so they would have to have access to the basic hulls in significant numbers and have the ability to refurbish and supply them. They have already supplied about eighty vehicles to Ukraine so it would seem achievable.
aha, I think I might have an answer to my own question - this organisation seems to specialise in refurbing old CVRTs for both military and private collectors - CVR(T) Modernisation & Enhancements | Military Vehicle Solutions Ltd

I can't imagine the numbers will be large. But at least its a project realistically within reach of a crowd funder. But does Ukraine really have a need for penny-packets of light armoured reconnaissance vehicles with no indigenous supply chain, training, or, presumably, compatible up to date military kit installed? Munitions and ammo would also appear to be a major potential issue - who still makes 76mm ammo for the Scorpions low pressure gun> Perhaps they'd be better off with Scimitars - but even them, most of the other operational limitations and difficulties still apply...

Fascinating story
 
Here is a clue. There is a company in the UK (possibly this one) that has supplied a good number of the APC version to Ukraine. This could be a follow up.

I have found the Video that backs up what I read a few months ago

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=emN3LoJMwrE


Scimitars? That means 30mm RARDEN for Ukraine! My favourite weird autocannon.

Very high velocity, low rate of fire, three round clips, hand cranked, extremely accurate.

Great article on the gun, written by Major Percy Hobart, of 'Hobart's Funnies' fame from WW2:


APDS is supposedly enough to penetrate any Soviet era IFV beyond 1000m, most beyond 2000m.
 
As I've mentioned before, I would pay good money to see Russia provoke Finland (and Sweden, for that matter).

Russia's inability to remember history will be a hard lesson when they summon the founding member of the "f**ck around and find out" club from it's slumber.
 
When did the supply of 'Scorpions' take place? As I said, Scorpion has been out of production for decades... ?
The initial order for Latvia was about 116 tanks was delivered from the 1980's. A further order for 82 was delivered recently with the final examples being delivered in 2022.

As I said it seems achievable.

You are right saying that ammunition is likely to be a problem, but a lot of these are in use around the world so presumably ammunition and spares are available. One advantage of the CVR(T) range is how good they are in difficult ground which is important in Ukraine where the going can be very difficult
 
Last edited:
As I've mentioned before, I would pay good money to see Russia provoke Finland (and Sweden, for that matter).

Russia's inability to remember history will be a hard lesson when they summon the founding member of the "f**ck around and find out" club from it's slumber.

I think the Russians have their hands pretty full at this time -- it's like 7 PM on a Friday night at Sonic for 'em. "Good lord, another order?!" said every Russki soldat.
 
Aside from use as Reconnaissance and FO (Forward Observer) platforms, the Scorpion and Scimitar are quite useful as infantry fire support vehicles, and both are capable of taking out light armour vehicles and/or ruining buildings and bunkers. They are also fast enough and armed/armoured well enough that they could be useful for exploitation after successful breakthrough operations. The only thing better than artillery strikes and air strikes on rear area marshaling, supply, and HQ units - is direct fire.
 
re 76mm and 30mm ammunition for the Scorpion and Scimitar.

I do not remember what the company was, but as of 5 or 6 years ago there was still someone manufacturing 76mm ammo for the guns on the Scorpion.

The RARDEN 30mm gun is still in frontline service with the UK on their Warrior IFV, and ammunition is still being manufactured.
 
Last edited:
As I've mentioned before, I would pay good money to see Russia provoke Finland (and Sweden, for that matter).

Russia's inability to remember history will be a hard lesson when they summon the founding member of the "f**ck around and find out" club from it's slumber.
That is not going to happen. It's all blah blah blah for internal consumption. Or most probably, as mentioned in this other post, they play mad as protection insurance.
 
This sentence caught my eye:
The diplomat also said it was not clear that Putin could accept a defeat in the conflict because it did not seem that Putin "understands how to lose".
The 3-day dash to Kiev turned out to be a forever war :tearsofjoy:
 
Interesting, russia claims destruction of a non-existant GLSDB that was suposedly launched from a HIMARS that Rusia already claimed to be destroyed (several times).

Pretty sure it was actually a Russian pilot who took out the Death Star.
 
Is it a mistake if it's doctrine?
Or just poorly executed?
That is the question, Greg.

The following in no order
- arrogance
- underestimate
- lack of preparation
- doctrine
- wrong doctrine for terrain and type of conflict
- unreliable 'associates'
- over-reliance of special forces - spez and paras - impossible tasks

Sound like something we are watching now - different scale but same WW2 winning ways ....
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back