www.defense-aerospace.com
www.politico.com
www.abc.net.au
Ukraine has proven to be a great place to send ones short-dated weaponry. And a note on optics, when doves and isolationists complain about the billions $ given to Ukraine, much of the value includes kit that would have been discarded and written off the books.
Decision To Give ATACMS To Ukraine Is About To Become Easier
With ATACMS' replacement arriving very soon, one major argument against sending the ballistic missiles to Ukraine would lose its potency.www.thedrive.com
Indeed. Here's $110 million. There's likely dozens of these annually.
www.govconwire.com
Abrams are great for a breakthrough. But Ukraine needs significantly more de-mining capability to achieve it.Abrams Tanks to Reach Ukraine "In a Matter of Days:" Pentagon
WASHINGTON --- Ukraine’s efforts to break through Russia’s defensive lines could soon benefit from some long-awaited firepower — some 31 U.S.-made M1 ...
Or forget that often such systems/support results in jobs at home in their own country
Agreed - would love to see some M1150 Assault Breacher Vehicles included too. IMHO, these things look even more fearsome than a tank coming at you:
