Alternative German tanks & AFVs (1 Viewer)

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

Short 50mm was at 400 kg for the total gun = barrel + breech block + breech (together 223 kg) + cradle + recoil system (together 177 kg). Long 50mm was at 435 kg, while the short 75mm was at 490 kg.
From here.
 

Good point about the size of the cartridge maximum diameter.

As for diesel, I think we've discussed it in several threads over the past few years. At the level of the individual tank the difference might not be hugely significant, as the smaller fuel tanks for a given range are offset by a bigger and heavier engine?

But reducing the logistics volume might be significant, although partially offset by requirement to support both petrol and diesel rather than only petrol?

But the biggest benefits would have been in the fuel production itself. Fischer Tropsch plants (suitable for diesel type fuels) are much less capital intensive than the Bergius process plants that produce high octane petrol. And even if you have access to crude oil, diesel production requires only fractional distillation and none of the petrochemical heroics required for high octane petrol.

The Germans originally chose petrol for their tanks because they thought that petrol would be easier to come by. When eventually it was reported to them that synthetic diesel production would be easier they started programs to design diesel tank engines, but nothing became of them before the end of the war.
 

Users who are viewing this thread