pinehilljoe
Senior Airman
- 742
- May 1, 2016
How did they do it? I think of approach speeds of 300 to 500 miles per hour, 100 to 30 yards apart, one or two seconds to think and fire a burst.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Most tried their best to achieve surprise when they could. When they could not, that's when the tactics started to be diverse. Some guys thought roll was the best escape ... roll as hard as you can for the count to two or three or four, stop, pull as hard as you can ... lather rinse repeat until clear. Others said break into the attackers. Still others had different ideas.
Everything spun off 'who sees the other guy first'. ETO fighter pilot doctrine could be summed up as "Never leave your leader", "Attack, attack", "Break Hard (instinct to follow without time to plan) when attacked in shooting range, "Turn into the attacker if possible if you see them before they start shooting"
So I'd say what I've heard could be summed up by saying:
1. Surprise and ambush the enemy plane if you can. There are several ways to do that depending on the person's proclivities. This is the number 1 best option.
2. In case YOU get ambushed, you need to have a definite plan on what to do when it happens, depending on from which side and whether it comes from above or below. Follow the plan or die wondering why you didn't, IF you survive the first cannon burst.
3. If you are doing the attacking and the enemy knows you are there and coming, no two guys seemed to have exactly the same notion of what the best attack might be. A lot depended on how many you were attacking. It would not be the same for a flight of four versus four as with maybe 4 versus 50 or 50 versus 4. I surmise it probably depended on who taught you and how you practiced when dogfighting with friends/ instructors, etc., but that was my own take-away. Some said large formation attack methods were briefed. Some never mentioned it.
4. About the only thing almost everyone agreed on was the worst thing was for YOU to start firing too soon and it was a GOOD thing when the enemy did that. Alternately, the worst thing was to load tracers for the last few shells. Then EVERYONE including the enemy knew when you ran out of ammo.
Any and all tactics for a fighter pilot boiled down to "see the enemy, attack the enemy - follow me". Squadron leaders, time permitting, would direct a bounce - based on the size of the enemy force. For singles/pairs or flights, maybe lead the bounce with is own flight - larger force, lead a section or the squadron.
I have heard a lot of different opinions from very good pilots on two specifics related to their guns. Boresighting convergence distance (except for P-38/Bf 109). My father, Hovde, Gabreski, Brown, Kinnard and many others liked 250-300 yards. Tracers - most loaded either zero (my father, Henry Brown, Kinnard and others) or 1:5 range - and as Greg stated AAF FG's discarded 'last 20'. Personally, I doubt that a 109 driver would know when the guy chasing him had run out of ammo based on carefully viewing tracer strings whacking on him. Hans Scharff ("The Interrogator") talked about disseminating this practice to LW leaders but doubts that it made any tactical difference.
I know that isn't very definite, but I could probably write 20 pages on what I have heard ... and NOBODY wants to read that, especially second-hand. Guys like Bill Marshall (Drgondog) have talked with more WWII pilots than I have, and many of the ones he spoke with were aces and pilots of some note. The guys I have spoken with were just pilots, some with victories and some with a number of missions without ever seeing an enemy aircraft. So their comments were from the training only perspective.
The most experienced combat pilot I knew was Ralph Parr. I knew him when I was flying in Scottsdale, Arizona in the 1980s. He had some humdinger stories, mostly about how he got himself into trouble and then had to quickly figure a way OUT of the trouble, sometimes at very low level with marginal fuel state. He was descriptive, and very open to discussion and didn't need to "build himself up." Definitely liked the F-86! A very likable and personable guy. I lost contact around 1988 - 1989 and he passed away in 2012 in Texas.
I first met Parr when he came to Eglin (I was 7 or 8) along with a contingent of F-86 pilots pleading for 20mm guns in 1953. He became a good friend of dad's and over the years he would show up for a 'burn meat - sip brown water' get togethers. He had one of the best Dry sense of humor of any man I have ever met - Greg probably heard his stories about how he became an object of targeted prosecution by USSR for 'war crimes' after he shot down an IL-2 loaded with USSR intelligence personnel on the way to support the peace talks near the end of Korean War. Or the day he was hit hard by NVA flak near the Trail, was on fire and his trailing flight was describing the fire - when his GIB speculated on who was on fire?". The last and best story was from Korea when he bounced a flight of MiG 15s thinking he was covered by his wingman - who broke off because one of his tanks wouldn't punch off. But a.) the 'flight' turned out to be a squadron and b.) his gunsight bulb failed. His narrative of the fight was a classic. Think George Goeble on steroids (for folks as old as I am).
QUOTE]
Two AFC's (Korea, VN), one of them was a downgrade from MoH recommended by Marines at Khe Sanh. One helluva fighter pilot, outstanding shooter that won at least one William Tell competition.
RIP Ralph Parr
Is that what the video game says? Lol.How did they do it? I think of approach speeds of 300 to 500 miles per hour, 100 to 30 yards apart, one or two seconds to think and fire a burst.
Roman's (Seesul) friend was Willi Reische.
Standard American practice was to Zero .50 Caliber guns at 400 yards, not 500, but 500 would still give enough hits to down most single engine fighter planes. Do a google search for fighter gun zero pattern images, or something like that to find copies out of training manuals.Is that what the video game says? Lol.
I don't know if you're talking about peeling off or chasing down an enemy fighter. In the cats, I think I recall, 500 yards was the sweet spot for the 50 cals. You let them have it there, they aren't coming home. I talked to a lot over the years, in my Dad's club. It started out as just Navy, but, as the years go by, you take whatever you can get, so there were Army pilots in there, too, near the end.