FLYBOYJ
"THE GREAT GAZOO"
what the hell kind of half wit chart is that it doesn't even have Britain down as using the Hunter
I knew you'd point that out!!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
what the hell kind of half wit chart is that it doesn't even have Britain down as using the Hunter
The 20mm would work well in air-to-air and air-to-ground as it did in the Hunter. Larger caliber cannons like those on the Mig-15 or Mig-17 had velocity problems as admitted by some pilots, it would be like lobbing a brick at something, but god help you if you got hit by one. Remember, later model F-86s had 20mms as well...
A lot more operators used the Sabre (Gotta love Wikpedia)
37 Operators
22 Operators
thats how you got the F86s in the RAF and the kill ratio of almost 2-1 for the sabre over the Hunter in the indo/pakistan wars cannot be over lookedPS most of the Sabre operators got them with MAP packages, we being tighter, stingier or plain meaner with our money, made the people who bought Hunters pay full whack.
PPS It did generally take a lot of .50's to take down an enemy but one 30mm often did the trick
thats how you got the F86s in the RAF and the kill ratio of almost 2-1 for the sabre over the Hunter in the indo/pakistan wars cannot be over looked
Both were great aircraft but I think the F-86 distributed a heck of a lot more used aircraft parts than the Hunter!
Yea, the Mig-15 had it's problems! 8)Didn't realise they were that unreliable
I have dug out an old article written by an RAF pilot who flew the Sabre MK4 in the RAF.
Likes
G suit (remember he came from flying Meteors)
Visibility (loved it)
T-14E ejector seat very comfy (with armrests)
Cockpit (heating that worked, selective differential presure, defrosting and demisting that also worked)
Handling (described as delightfull)
AN/APG 30 radar (good up to 1,800 yard)
The sight had an automatic bomb release
Cleared for intentional spinning
Radio compass
Dislikes
Bonedome (they didn't fit well and didn't have a visor)
Takeoff run
T-14E ejector seat (wasn't as effective as the MB if you had to punch out)
Engine (underpowered and required external power to start)
CG (very sensitive)
Rate of climb and angle of climb
Guns (lacked punch)
In GA role the aproach angle was very shallow
Gyrosyn compass and the artificial horizon toppled easily
They were only in service for 4 years with the RAF
Sorry my memory on the RAF getting MAP Canadair F86's from the US must be flawed but the 2-1 sources I counted manually from these 2 locationsWe got Sabres in the RAF because we needed something better than the Meteor / Vampire before the Hunter was in service. Also it wasn't a 2 to 1 loss ratio, that has been covered earlier in the thread. It was 1 to 1 and the Indian Hunters were GA planes and in most cases at a tactical disadvantage.
Sorry my memory on the RAF getting MAP Canadair F86's from the US must be flawed but the 2-1 sources I counted manually from these 2 locations
Indian Air-to-Air Victories since 1948
Pakistani Air-to-Air Victories
Both were great aircraft but I think the F-86 distributed a heck of a lot more used aircraft parts than the Hunter!
Certainly if we were talking about an F100/Mig19/F8 comparison the Crusader would get my vote.
It had two things the F86 didn't, a decent engine and 20mm's
Sorry FJ
Good fighter, as we know the Israelis put them to good use but they got mauled by FAA Harriers during the Falklands conflict. Again throughout the 50s and 60s more aircraft fell to the F-86s guns than any other combat aircraft.Mirage 111