Best Fighter

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

Nope, the F-2 has a 15mm in the nose and two 7.92mm machine guns above the engine, but the F-4 and G-2 both have a 20mm cannon in the nose and two synchronized 7.92mm machine guns above the engine...
 
And Pre-War -109 prototypes were fitted with RR Kestrels.
 
I don't know about that one, RR engines were sluts of the aviation world they got around a bit. So it's possible.
 
Just checked, they did indeed...


I always found the V-1 interesting, if only so for its engine and twin-tail...

ju87v1-01.jpg
 
I'm not sure it would. The single tail probably offered a greater surface area. It's interesting to note that some of the last versions of the B-24, the PB4Y2 and the B-24N featured a single tail in place of the twin fins of the earlier models.
 
I thought that the width of the twin tail would make it more stable. Avation obviously different to motoring in that respect then. :rolleyes:
 
Those late B-24s weren't Liberators were they? They were called Privateers?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back