Best Fighter

Discussion in 'Old Threads' started by GregP, Jul 28, 2003.

  1. GregP

    GregP Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2003
    Messages:
    5,832
    Likes Received:
    787
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Electrical Engineer, Aircraft Restoration
    Location:
    Rancho Cucamonga, California, U.S.A.
    Has anyone seen the August 2003 edition of Flight Jourmal?

    In it, Corky Meyer was asked to pick the best fighter in both the European (ETO) and Pacific (PTO) Theaters. He elected to use the following criteria:

    1) Must have been built in numbers of 10,000 or more and must have seen constant production improvement in combat capability

    2) Must have been capable of 4 missions: a) fighter vs. fighter, b) air-to-ground, 3) bomber protection, and 4) Photorecon.

    3) Must have been friendly to pilots with 200 hours of training.

    4) Service record.

    Based on the above criteria, he concluded the best ETO fighter was the Republic P-47 Thunderbolt, and the best PTO fighter was the Grumman Hellcat.

    I must say, he defended his choices very well with clear numbers and logic. He DID state that the overall winner may well have been the Russian Yak-1 / Yak-9 series of aircraft, but that the combat records of things like sorties, victories, losses, and bomb tonnage dropped were unavailable ... so he placed it 5th, just behind the North American Mustang.

    If you haven't seen the article, you might be able to find it at http://www.flightjournal.com . Check it out.

    Corky was there at the time and flew most of the planes in question. The ones he didn't fly were clearly identified.
     
  2. the lancaster kicks ass

    the lancaster kicks ass Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2003
    Messages:
    19,980
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    38
    well, it doesn't look like "corkey meyer" knows a great deal about the subject, a truely great fighter isn't defined by criteria, a great fighter will be in a field of it's own, standing out above the rest....... and as for the "200 hours training" comment, most pilots managed nine hours beofre getting thrown into combat.......... :scratch:
     
  3. cheddar cheese

    cheddar cheese Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2004
    Messages:
    20,349
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    WSM, England
    nah the best fighter has to be british, something like the messerschmitt bf-109 *i know it aint british but i feel like being annoying* :sign4:
     
  4. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    Nah.....the Bf was good, but I really think that the 110 was better. The supermarine was also a pretty good fighter, along with the B-42 Corsair
     
  5. cheddar cheese

    cheddar cheese Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2004
    Messages:
    20,349
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    WSM, England
    i never heard of the 110 - im stupid you see. but i know nowt about planes, i just like em. i do like the bf-109 though
     
  6. Erich Hartmann

    Erich Hartmann New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2004
    Messages:
    27
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    hmmm...........neither have lots of people, thats ok though
     
  7. Crazy

    Crazy Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2003
    Messages:
    699
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Home Page:
    Gasp! Let us correct this!

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    Learn all about the 110 here
     
  8. Erich Hartmann

    Erich Hartmann New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2004
    Messages:
    27
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    Goldfish WATERPROOF.............no possible way...
     
  9. Crazy

    Crazy Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2003
    Messages:
    699
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Home Page:
    I didnt think it was possible either, but I'm beyond disbelief. I just take it in stride now.

    seems a bit odd, though. I mean, waterproof, a goldfish? weird...
     
  10. cheddar cheese

    cheddar cheese Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2004
    Messages:
    20,349
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    WSM, England
    Cheers! i found that pretty helpful. at least now im a little bit less dumb than i already was
     
  11. Crazy

    Crazy Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2003
    Messages:
    699
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Home Page:
  12. I./JG53_lud13

    I./JG53_lud13 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2004
    Messages:
    18
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    Only one stand above all....Bf 109 (by the way P-51 only had numerical strenght )
     
  13. Crazy

    Crazy Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2003
    Messages:
    699
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Home Page:
    True lud, the Bf-109 had a lifespan from before the war began to the final defense of Berlin. Not bad for a German plane ;)

    (BTW, u an IL-2 FB person? I recognize your name from VOW)
     
  14. I./JG53_lud13

    I./JG53_lud13 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2004
    Messages:
    18
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    Yep m8:)
    Crazy Serb:)
     
  15. the lancaster kicks ass

    the lancaster kicks ass Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2003
    Messages:
    19,980
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    38
    come on people, lets not forget the British planes, spitfire the hurricaneamoung others
     
  16. I./JG53_lud13

    I./JG53_lud13 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2004
    Messages:
    18
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    hurricane was not so good , but spitfire on the other very good althroug matched through war by german planes.Only mkXIV are a bit ahead of germans but on the other hand 109k-4 could hold on against all allied fighters, not to mention fw190d9 (considerd by many the best german piston fighter not by me ) and me 262. But again TOO LITLE TOO LATE
     
  17. Erich Hartmann

    Erich Hartmann New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2004
    Messages:
    27
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    The me-262 was good, only hitler screwed them up by making them bombers. They did not have the time or qualified pilots.
     
  18. the lancaster kicks ass

    the lancaster kicks ass Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2003
    Messages:
    19,980
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    38
    yea, but all that aside it was one hell of a fighter..............
     
  19. Hot Space

    Hot Space Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2004
    Messages:
    2,178
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Occupation:
    Ghost Hunter.
    Location:
    Bournemouth, UK
    Home Page:
    If the Spitfire Mk XIV or the F.21 (If they got the 21 working ok :rolleyes: ) had the range of the P-51, it WOULD of been the best all round allied fighter of the war, M8 8) 8) 8)

    Hot Space
     
  20. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    i think it unfair to say best fighter should be built in over 10000 planes.
    just because a lot wer built doesn't mean they wer the best,some wer cancelled due to end of war-had the war continued it woulda been the best...means nothing better was worth producing.
    there wer some really good prototypes...mb5 f2g2 xp72 to name a few
    but for my pennies worth-the criteria are how well in dog fight at medium
    or how good at high altitude?
    for medium alts...my money is on the f8f or yak3/107
    above 25000 feet i would go for ta152h or p-51h
     
Loading...
Similar Threads
  1. wuzak
    Replies:
    33
    Views:
    2,881
  2. Oreo
    Replies:
    4
    Views:
    1,644
  3. plan_D
    Replies:
    412
    Views:
    38,211
  4. cheddar cheese
    Replies:
    1,032
    Views:
    93,097
  5. GregP
    Replies:
    372
    Views:
    86,094

Share This Page