Best German fighter for the Eastern Front

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

That's what I meant by my memory ran away from me, I wasn't accurate.
Thru the many articles , but all are from translations. They got the engine to run , what was replaced, is hard to determine. Some say no parts were replaced, some say skate rollers were replaced.
I'm a fairly experienced amature race mechanic ( 20 years), but I still haven't figured out what skate rollers are.
 

Of course there was nothing on engine running because it was a different recovery, a Valentine not T-34, I put the link because it was the source of my photo and in the article there are more photos on the Valentine recovery. Maybe Tyrodtom means this recovery:
LiveLeak.com - WW2 tank recovery Ukraine
 
Ok, I have to say that T-34 is in remarkable condition. Maybe the engine only needed cleaning and a few parts. Thanks for the link!

@ tyrodtom; I think your right about that V-2 engine
 
altsym said:
Ok, I have to say that T-34 is in remarkable condition. Maybe the engine only needed cleaning and a few parts. Thanks for the link!

@ tyrodtom; I think your right about that V-2 engine
Click to expand...

Hello Altsym
one important part of the video for me was the mg magazines because I saw same type mags during my milit service
 
Juha said:
So 40-70km/h slower than La-5FN in Soviet tests
Click to expand...

Yeah. That's something. But any plane would start to lose the specifications after some use . I have doubt if with the wooden ones it was more quickly, and if yes how more. There's also the question if operational data corresponded with the test one.
 
Last edited:
Usually, production aircraft did not reach projected maximum speed.

Quality control in SU was very limited, especially for aircraft and tanks. Most important was to get it to the front. Same thing happened with German war production towards the end. So many parts missing or malfunctioning. And of course sabotage. In the last months experienced Luftwaffe crews would inspect the delivered aircraft and chose which ones were safe to fly.

Kris
 
That 40-70km/h difference was with production La-5FNs randomly selected for testing, but of course after use and standing long time in open reduced performance of all frontline fighters, and yes wooden ones more than metal planes, I assume. And in combat the habit of many Soviet fighter pilots to fly the cockpit at least partially open also reduced speed.
 
I've seen lots of photos with various pilots cruising out to battle areas with the canopy back, hot weather, and low altitude makes for a hot cockpit.
I'm sure when they could they'd keep the canopy back , but slide it forward when they entered combat.
But sometimes they would be surprised ,cruising unaware with the canopy back. Surely none of them entered combat with it open deliberatelY?
Some pilots could be hard headed, maybe they valued the added visibility of a open canopy more they they thought they needed the added speed with it closed.
 
At least early in the war the quality of Soviet plexiglass was indifferent and in some types the cockpit was at least initially hard to open in higher speeds, these were the main reasons for Soviet fighter pilots´habit to flew with at least partially open cockpit in combat zones, early Italian planes had the same problem. One of the small things which had their effects on actual performance that are not shown in specs
 
Other thing are the Russian tactics: they only started to do figher sweeps after mid-1944. Before this, they were not allowed to pursuit German planes. Instead, they shoud only escort strike planes and cover the ground forces. Also, for most of the war only the squadron leader had a radio transmitter. The rest only had a receptor. And early in the war few fighters had radio at all.
 
Last edited:
Test report states some supercharger problems on this La-5FN but it's not known whether this was a built-in defect or from wear. Even in soviet tests the performance varied a lot.
Airframe, especially wings, was stated to be in good condition though.
 
IMO instances of wartime sabotage were greatly exaggerated. Typically it's the excused used for defective equipment when nobody wants to take responsibility. The excuse was especially common in Soviet Union where failure to deliver required quantities of operational equipment would get you killed.
 
If you've done much reading at all on restoration of wartime German equipment, one thing you'll hear often is reports of faults found that were suspected sabotage.
A lot of the slave workers didn't have much hope of surviving the war, lots of times the Germans would execute substitute people as a example, not those guilty of sabotage.
So if you were a slave worker, it didn't matter if you commited sabotage or not, you could be hung because someone commited sabotage, and you were chosen to pay for it.

Not a lot of critical thought put into it, like a lot of the 3rd Reichts policies toward non-Germans.
 
A lot of the Soviet workers didn't have much hope of surviving the war, lots of times Stalin would execute substitute people as a example, not those guilty of sabotage.

Now the statement makes more sense. Stalin sent thousands to die in the Gulag for being "economic wreckers". A few American engineers even went to the Gulag charged with this crime.
 

Evidently to you, that excuses the German's methods. To you hard labor, and hanging are equal treatment.

Dave it's always been strange to me that you seem to think you can whitewash the 3rd Reichts excesses with Stalin's.
 
Last edited:
I can be wrong, but I have the impression that the conditions of Soviet workers were worse in the first 2 years of the war. From 1943 onwards, with victory more secure and plenty of LL aid (including food) the things should have improved (altought maybe not to the point of Western countries).
 

I dont doubt there were instances of poor workmanship in Soviet equipment. But it is a long way from saying there weer QA issues here and there, and then claiming this was a problem of strategic significance, or that the T-34 was an unrelaibale tank, or even your claim that they were not expected to last that long.

by comparison, German equipment failures were of strategic significance, and quite horrible, whether you want to measure that "horribleness on an isolated or in comparsison to the Soviets. The relief effort of Stalingrad failed because of equipment failures in German equipment, the assault on Moscow faltered in part because of the numerous breakdowns and failures of German equipment, I have already mentioned the Panther failures at kursk. The initial deployments of Tigers outside of Leningrad saw failure after failure of the tanks, and the list goes on and on. I have yet to find evidence of equipment failures of Soviet that were of strategic significance, or at least on the same scale as those I have mentioned on the German side.

Some years ago I had the honour of looking over an ex-soviet Whiskey class SS. I was struck by the high quality workmanship. Terrible design, (it was based on a German Type VII after all) but as well made as any conventional sub that I have ever seen. Doesnt prove anything other than to say that at least some Soviet manufactures were of good quality. then again, I had a friend who had the misfortune of owning one of those lada Nevas, terrible design AND a terrible construction as well. So on my own observation I would have to say that at bes Soviet equipment was patchy. But thats a ling way from saying all Soviet equipment was poor. And the historical records show that. Especially for the T-34.

With regard to the 35 year claim, I was thinking of the Syrian Army, which retained their T-34/85 in frontline service until after the 1973 Yom Kippur....thats about 30 years, which is not a bad service record. They retired their PzkPfw IVs after the 1967 war
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)

Similar threads

W
The scarcity of fighter to fighter FW-190A pilot combat accounts...
2 3
Replies
52
Views
3K
GrauGeist
R
A look at German fighter Ace kill claims
24 25 26
Replies
506
Views
24K
Juha3
J
T
Average sorties/kill for German night fighters
Replies
16
Views
2K
Geoffrey Sinclair
G
A
Best WW2 Seafire vs. best A6M Zero
Replies
9
Views
1K
Shortround6
S
The best fighter of the 1930s
4 5 6
Replies
104
Views
11K
bf109xxl
Menu
Log in
Register