Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
I am always leery of "historians" with NO military experience who pontificate on subjects such as this.
Plus, claiming to have a definitive answer to something that will only ever be an opinion.I am always leery of "historians" with NO military experience who pontificate on subjects such as this.
I am always leery of "historians" with NO military experience who pontificate on subjects such as this.
Plus, claiming to have a definitive answer to something that will only ever be an opinion.
Well he shouldnt put on such a daft click bait title then.He doesn't name any general at all. He explains why such an opinion cannot really be offered intelligently.
Well he shouldnt put on such a daft click bait title then.
Somehow I got the impression that he was just a video game developer. Wrong?Right ... and he even addresses that. The definitive answer is that there's no way to make the judgement.
Watching the video first before critiquing it helps me out.
Somehow I got the impression that he was just a video game developer. Wrong?
But what they nearly all have in common is
not the merest attempt to provide a set of criteria.
Then why watch the F..n video?The video directly addresses this by pointing out that because there's no agreed criteria, rendering such discussions meaningless.
Then why watch the F..n video?