Best Naval Fighter

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

Nope. They just hover over the water like that at great speeds. This is going back years, but i remember an item about it on Top Gear: Waterworld several years ago.

They're kinda freaky if you ask me...
 
Yes. There were more Hellcats and they were in the thick of it from the day they arrived. Corsairs were more often employed with the USMC where many more ground attack sorties were flown.
 
the lancaster kicks ass said:
and the jap's carrier force was pretty much spent.....................
Click to expand...

What do you mean by that? Because although not really a naval plane, the P-38 shot down more Jap planes than any other...

Question: Did the P-38 ever have experiments for use on carriers?
 
I don't know... But logically, I don't think they tried because the plane was pretty big for a fighter. They tried with the P-51 though, but due to the lack of visibility the pilots had, it was next to impossible to successfully land a P-51 on a carrier.

But I seriously doubt that they tried with P-38s. Even if the plane was able to land on a carrier, I think they would have preferred any smaller plane.
 
Hell, they might have...

They tried the Mustang (yes, I know it's smaller and more logical than a P-38), as well as a Mossie (entered service; before you go on a rant about its size, I'm not familiar in the size/dimensions of either)...
 
When I was researching the Lightning for a presentation, I did read that Lockheed designed a P-38 for carrier duty, complete with folding wings, arresting hook and a strengthened undercarriage. The Navy wasn't keen on such a big plane on their decks and they disliked liquid cooled engines for carrier based aircraft. The Navy did fly some lightnings from land bases though. The carrier version never made it off the drawing board.

It's bigger than you think really. If you have stood next to a P-51 or a Spit, then next to a Lightning, it's big!
 
Ah ok thanks 8) I knew id read about it somewhere

Hmmmmmmm, I was always under the impression that for a twin-engined plane the lightning was fairly small. (I'm saying this based on the size difference between my 2 models of a P-38F and an Fw-190D-9)
 
It was big for a fighter. If you compare it with Navy fighters of the time, it was considerably larger. Compare the Lightning and the Hellcat:
Lightning
Wing Span: 52ft. 0in.
Length: 37ft. 10in.
Height: 12ft. 10in.
Hellcat
Wing Span: 42ft. 10in.
Length: 33ft. 7in.
Height: 13ft. 6in.

The wingspan was almost 10 feet wider. On an aircraft carrier, space was always at a premium.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)

Similar threads

L
  • Locked
What Criteria should be used for determining the best land based piston fighter
9 10 11
Replies
218
Views
38K
Lighthunmust
L
N
Best Aircrafts
Replies
4
Views
3K
TheMustangRider
O
Poor Aircraft, Best Pilot
Replies
4
Views
3K
net_sailor
  • Locked
Best Piston Engined Fighter Ever
8 9 10
Replies
187
Views
36K
lesofprimus
Naval Aircraft Factory N3N
Replies
2
Views
4K
Maharg
Menu
Log in
Register