Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Thats an impressive gain. The biggest problem with maximum speeds during level flight - is at what altitude?
I have seen figures for Spitfire Mk 1 as 362 mph at 18,500ft and for a Mk21 as 455 at 25,600 ft. Which makes a straight comparison alittle difficult!
Adler, agreed. I forgot that the first version of the 109 in service was as slow as that so that is a very impressive gain indeed. It was said of the Spitfire that it grew in weight by the equivalent of 36 passengers and all their luggage. Do you have any information on the weight gain of the 109? Being a more compact airframe did it manage not to pile on so much?
Waynos said:My search for a reliable definitive history of the 109 has been fruitless, do you have any recommendations? .
I'm sure that everyone will agree that the best aircraft of WW2 was the Spitfire Mk VIII: high speed, long ranged, fast climbing, deadly firepower.
The Spitfire VIII served around the world and was very popular with the USAAF squadrons that flew it:
http://www.spitfiresite.com/history/articles/2008/07/uncle-sams-spitfires.htm
I'm sure that everyone will agree that the best aircraft of WW2 was the Spitfire Mk VIII: high speed, long ranged, fast climbing, deadly firepower.
The Spitfire VIII served around the world and was very popular with the USAAF squadrons that flew it:
http://www.spitfiresite.com/history/articles/2008/07/uncle-sams-spitfires.htm
Does it still fly in an operational role today? (Other than in a museum). Has it hauled thousands if not millions of people and freight from all corners of the world??? Has it served in almost every major conflict up until the mid 1980s????
Well the Norseman was a good plane, but I'm not sure it edges out the Spitfire...
Noorduyn Norseman - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Adler, agreed. I forgot that the first version of the 109 in service was as slow as that so that is a very impressive gain indeed. It was said of the Spitfire that it grew in weight by the equivalent of 36 passengers and all their luggage. Do you have any information on the weight gain of the 109? Being a more compact airframe did it manage not to pile on so much?
My search for a reliable definitive history of the 109 has been fruitless, do you have any recommendations? I think I have enough Spitfire books.
The best was P-51 Mustang, the bad was P-39 Airacobra, its only my opinion...
yeah but without them those big juicy bombers and transports are fish in a barrel...
thats what makes a free country great....differing opinions.