After test were competed the engines were re-rated and some or all of the tests run again at the higher rating. Apparently there was a bit of a mismatch between the props and the power available at the higher ratings.
Top speed was 334-334mph at 15,600ft-16,500ft.
Something sure seems to be off, and it cannot be blamed on flat black paint or radar aerials or IFF aerials or????
The 'old limitations' for the Mk.VI are listed as 2800 rpm and +7 psi, while the new ones are 2900 rpm and +8 psi.
Bristol gives 1675 HP at 2900 rpm and +8.25 psi, S/C in low gear; I don't have the date. On 2400 rpm and +6 psi ('climb and max continuous'), low gear, the max power was 1355 HP. To me, 2800 rpm and +7 psi looks like 1500-1550 HP down low.
On 2900 rpm, +8.25 psi and S/C in high gear, Bristol gives 1455 HP at 12000 ft. On 2400 rpm and +6 psi, they give 1240 HP at 12000 ft. We'd be probably looking at 1360-1380 HP at 2800 rpm and +7 psi?
The Mk.XVI (difference vs. Mk.VI was a single-lever carb control, made possible due to the automated weakening of the mixture for cruise settings) on 2800 rpm and +7 psi made 1600 HP at 5000 ft, and ~1375 HP at 13000-13500 ft, so my math is not that bad for the Mk.VI on reduced settings.
(better power values were with 2900 rpm and +8.25 psi boost, obviously)
Again, note that data sheet gives very optimistic rated altitudes' values for the Hercules VI (they do the same with rated altitudes for the Merlin XX, BTW).
FWIW, BMW 801C did 1361 HP at 15090 ft (2550 rpm), plus better exhaust thrust value.