Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
F-35 or JAS 39What are the options Canada is considering?
Well if you're looking to stretch dollars up front I would have to say the JAS 39. For versatility and a return on investment, the F-35. The specific mission of this aircraft also has to be identified to meet Canada's defense needs. Remember, Canada was an original partner of the F-35 program but balked on the purchase when the Harper and now Trudeau government balked on the perceived cost and all the negative BS that followed the F-35 from the beginning. If Canada buys the F-35 there is no doubt the Canadian aircraft industry will see plenty of subcontract work, not only to support their purchase but the entire F-35 program.Aside from fiduciary duty, which one you liking FLYBOYJ?
Yep, and by people who don't know or understand the aircraft, there are some who never recognized that there are 3 versions of the F-35! The program was not perfect and there were many mistakes made by LMCO AND the Pentagon, but in the end I think we have a very capable weapons system. There have been pilots who have flown this aircraft and have now retied from active duty and little if any negative comments have been made by them.I've read many negatives about the F-35. Just never seems to be written by pilots.
Yes, and many will cite "old" info, but it's amazing since that video where we are today.On the Military Aviation History YouTube channel, there was a vid on why Canada wasn't going to buy the F-35. I think the host was in the F-35 camp. It was posted a while ago.
F-35 or JAS 39
I hope they take the JAS39 simply to spite LM.
I think in as much that they misunderstood what this aircraft actually does/ can do.The full story of F-35 won't be told for decades, and when it is, there are going to be a lot of surprised people.
That would be the optimum choice if Canada can afford it. Both aircraft have multi-role capabilities but I would lean more using the F/A-18 in an air-to-air role and use the F-35 for what it was intended for - a strike aircraft.Maybe follow Australia's lead and get both the F-35 and Super Hornet?