Could the P51A been made available for the Battle of Midway?

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

Greg Boeser said:
The appearance of the Ki-44 in China came as a nasty shock to Chennault's boys who up to then had had a field day with the Ki-27s and Ki-43s. They considered it better than the P-51.
Click to expand...
Who's they?

It couldn't have been the AVG/23rd FG, because the P-51 didn't reach the PTO until much later in the war and by the time the P-51 did get into China, it's main adversary was the KI-84.
 
The Ki 44 could outclimb and out turn a P-51A. Above 15,000 feet the P-51B/C closed the climb rate, was close to turn and much faster above 15000 feet
 
GrauGeist said:
Who's they?

It couldn't have been the AVG/23rd FG, because the P-51 didn't reach the PTO until much later in the war and by the time the P-51 did get into China, it's main adversary was the KI-84.
Click to expand...

No less a personage than Colonel "Tex" Hill, after losing two P-51As from the 76th Fighter Squadron, 23rd FG, over Hong Kong on 1 Dec, 1943 to a detachment of the 85th Sentai, is quoted as saying: "I don't think we can beat these new Japs in the air." Chennault replied: "Don't worry about it. just hit them on the ground." (Molesworth, Sharks over China)
 

Gotta wonder if they tried dog fighting
 
The Ki-44 was much different than the K-43. Actual wing loading difference between the Ki-44 and an Allison Mustang might depend on amount of fuel and ammo each has on board. The 161sq ft on the Ki-44 meant it didn't turn like other Japanese fighters. Actual turning ability of the Ki-44 vs the Mustang depends on the combat flap on the Ki-43 and the actual lift co-efficient of the wings, especially at high angles of attack.
However conventional boom and zoom didn't work so well against it as it not only had a high climb rate, it dove better than the other Japanese fighters. While not as fast as the P-51 it was much faster than the Ki-43 and Zero. 335mph at sea level and 376mph at 17,000ft. tactics that worked against the other Japanese fighters either didn't work or would be much slower in showing results against the KI-44. AS in diving away would still have the P-51 out diving the Ki-44 but the question is, is the difference in dive speed (or dive acceleration) enough to get out of range quickly and limit the Ki-44s firing opportunity?
I don't know which one accelerated better in level flight. The Ki-44 was about a ton lighter and had a more powerful engine.
The Allison P-51 may have been able to come out on top of the Ki-44, it just was going to need a lot of adjustment on the part of the pilots to meet the threat of a plane that did not behave the way most/all Japanese fighters had behaved up until then.
 
's
P-51A pilots from 530th Fighter Squadron probably disagreed. It met Ki-44's from 87th Sentai three times. That unit was transferred from Sumatra to Meiktila, Burma on 8 May, 1944.
11 May : 5 Ki-44's shot down with 4 pilots killed
12 May : 2 Ki-44's shot down with 2 pilots killed
14 May: 1 Ki-44's shot down

The 530th squadron had no losses in these combats.

After this short and disastrous stay in Burma 87th Sentai was withdrawn back to Palembang, Sumatra on May 21, 1944.
(Shores, Air War for Burma)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)

Similar threads

M
USAAF aircraft lost through transport sinkings during Battle of the Atlantic?
Replies
2
Views
443
fubar57
FW-190 and The Battle of Britain
2 3
Replies
40
Views
2K
Admiral Beez
A
Paper comparing the flight performance of the P-40E Warhawk and the A6M2 Zero
Replies
8
Views
1K
Ivan1GFP
I
A
The Myth of the British "Fixing" The Corsair
8 9 10
Replies
183
Views
13K
EwenS
E
S
State-of-the-art Japanese fighters with western engines
Replies
2
Views
89
spicmart
S
Menu
Log in
Register