Damaging / destroying aircrafts

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

True, the 2800 was an incredibly durable engine. That was also used on the B-17. You could get a lucky shot with a 20mm and take the engine out, but if you just hit one of the jugs, that wouldn't do it. It wouldn't fly well missing a jug, but it would still fly. Again, there are alot of variables.
 
The B-17 was powered by Wright R-1820s. The only American bomber of the war to use the R-2800 was (as far as I know) the A-26.
 
OOPS. I always get those 2 engines mixed up! Argh. Thanks for the correction. The 1820s are also in the T-28 trojans though. We have about a dozen -28s down at Camarillo airport and it took a bit to get used to hearing four of them fly over and not think it was a B-17.
 
It sure was, Lanc. I read a story about some P-47 pilots doing an attack run and had trouble finding the target, so they flew THROUGH the trees to find it! I will see if I can find that article again and post it.

I heard a joke that the P-47 couldn't really be shot down, you just had to put bullets into it until it was too heavy to fly.
 
Found it...

The P-47 was a rugged airplane, without a doubt.
During the Battle of the Bulge in 1944, German Field
Marshal von Rundstedt had hidden a munitions dump in
the woods of the Ardennes. P-47s were called upon to
destroy it, but they couldn't find it because of the
thick trees. What did the frustrated pilots do then?
They flew through the tops of the trees!

Pratt Whitney's representative in Europe, Martin
Graham, was there not long afterwards. "You could see
by the shattered trees and the torn branches where the
P-47s had gone through. You'd have to see it to
believe it. Those crazy kids couldn't see what was
hidden from above, so they went right into the forest
to find out. They cut a path right through the top of
the woods. They said every plane that went in and
chewed out the tunnel came out flying, too." (? The
Pratt Whitney Aircraft Story)
 
evangilder said:
Found it...

The P-47 was a rugged airplane, without a doubt.
During the Battle of the Bulge in 1944, German Field
Marshal von Rundstedt had hidden a munitions dump in
the woods of the Ardennes. P-47s were called upon to
destroy it, but they couldn't find it because of the
thick trees. What did the frustrated pilots do then?
They flew through the tops of the trees!

Pratt Whitney's representative in Europe, Martin
Graham, was there not long afterwards. "You could see
by the shattered trees and the torn branches where the
P-47s had gone through. You'd have to see it to
believe it. Those crazy kids couldn't see what was
hidden from above, so they went right into the forest
to find out. They cut a path right through the top of
the woods. They said every plane that went in and
chewed out the tunnel came out flying, too." (? The
Pratt Whitney Aircraft Story)

:shock:

That would be a sight worth seeing
 
Crazy said:
evangilder said:
Found it...

The P-47 was a rugged airplane, without a doubt.
During the Battle of the Bulge in 1944, German Field
Marshal von Rundstedt had hidden a munitions dump in
the woods of the Ardennes. P-47s were called upon to
destroy it, but they couldn't find it because of the
thick trees. What did the frustrated pilots do then?
They flew through the tops of the trees!

Pratt Whitney's representative in Europe, Martin
Graham, was there not long afterwards. "You could see
by the shattered trees and the torn branches where the
P-47s had gone through. You'd have to see it to
believe it. Those crazy kids couldn't see what was
hidden from above, so they went right into the forest
to find out. They cut a path right through the top of
the woods. They said every plane that went in and
chewed out the tunnel came out flying, too." (? The
Pratt Whitney Aircraft Story)

:shock:

That would be a sight worth seeing

Too damn right :shock: shock:
 
I don't think it was practiced beforehand. Could you imagine the student pilot on hearing they were going to fly through trees! I would think that would be hard on the prop, engines and airframe. More than once would be foolhardy IMO.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back