That's true.
Now that is rubbish. Nazi-Germany "sold" Baltic states and Finland to SU in Aug 39 and gave a free hand to Stalin to dealt with them as he wished.
A baloney to your rubbish. A lot of hot air has been babbled about the non agresson pact by people regurgitating a particular political line, a line that is
hypocritical for it assignes the blame to the Nazis and Germans when it was the Soviets that carried out these invasions and one that also turns a blind eye to the Soviet genocides while focusing on the Nazis.
The German-Soviet non-agression pact was about
1 ensuring peace and normalised relations between two powerfull nations.
2 developing trade of critical raw materials for economic reasons and to bypass possible British and Fench blockades
3 developing buffer states between these potentially dangerous adversaries.
4 dividing areas into spheres of influence to diffuse tensions.
5 Allowing room for border disputes
It was a way for Nazi Germany to restore the land and ethnic minorities lost to Poland under the treaty of Versailes after negotiations for German acess to the German city of Danzig via rail and autobahn failed.
This is the link to the treaty, including the secret portions:
Molotov-Ribbentrop Treaty, 1939
Secret Additional Protocol.
Article I.
In the event of a territorial and political rearrangement in the areas belonging to the Baltic States (Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania), the northern boundary of Lithuania shall represent the boundary of the spheres of influence of Germany and U.S.S.R. In this connection the interest of Lithuania in the Vilna area is recognized by each party.
Article II.
In the event of a territorial and political rearrangement of the areas belonging to the Polish state, the spheres of influence of Germany and the U.S.S.R. shall be bounded approximately by the line of the rivers Narev, Vistula and San.
The question of whether the interests of both parties make desirable the maintenance of an independent Polish States and how such a state should be bounded can only be definitely determined in the course of further political developments.
In any event both Governments will resolve this question by means of a friendly agreement.
You will note the treaty 1 talks of 'spheres of influence' not annexations (as the Soviets tried) and that 'spheres of influence' is not code for invasion and annexation: for instance
"the northern boundary of Lithuania shall represent the boundary of the spheres of influence of Germany and U.S.S.R. In this connection the interest of Lithuania in the Vilna area is recognized by each party."
Which indicates that the Nazis were
explicitly expecting at least Lithunia to remain independant.
The Nazi government certainly kept to its treaty obligations 100%. It may not have completed its weapons supplies to Finland. But Germany also removed two very sophisticated triaxial FLAK directors from Bismark (and Prinz Eugen) to supply to the Soviet union as part of treaty obligations: which meant that Bismark wen to sea with second rate gun directors for the rear two. It did not supply weapons to a country with which the Soviets were at war according to its treaty. As far as selling the Baltic states down the river, to an extent this is true but only to the extent of territorial realignments. The attack on Finland was the final irritation and warning.
When it was obvious that Stalins Russia could not be trusted to even comply with the spirit of the treaty the Germans invaded. Invading immediatly would not be possible, in part due to inevitalbe British and French opportunism.
As far as Finns being classed as 'subhumans'; by the Nazis: here is further exaggeration and myth. It was possible however to find some extraordinarily drunkard characters in Finland, it has a rather unique drinking problem often seen in parts of Scandinavia. Presumably if a German observed this that would constitute Nazi racial theory declaring Finns as sub-human.