Vic Balshaw
Major General
That looks great Ralph.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
On my first entry (in this GB62) I did finish the plate the 'bakelite' color. Just wondering, if on some, the plate was painted in the camo colors as is depicted in the instructions for this one?Bakelite was what I was trying to think off, I remember it still being used in the early 60s as an insulation material on RAF bases.
Actually the numbers as well. My 'supposition' on them being hidden (washable paint) won't fly?Just re-read your last post Ralph. Gun fairings in camo colours and you just need the "L", correct?
On my first entry (in this GB62) I did finish the plate the 'bakelite' color. Just wondering, if on some, the plate was painted in the camo colors as is depicted in the instructions for this one?
I think I'll go with inst illustration and leave it camoed. Funny though, the last picture posted, has the crew brush painting the stripes, no masking. And to think of all the effort I put into trying to get that 'perfect' lineTo be honest it is quite difficult to state if the base was unpainted or not. In many pictures it can be noticed that it wasn't. But there are images in which it looks like painted. Here is a part o f the well know shot of the Castle Bromwich factory "parking" with finished Mk.IXs I cut out the closest plane. IMHO either the base was painted or made of the material of a close colour tone to the Ocean Grey paint. The other kites standing there look similar.
View attachment 787146
Basicly the dark tone of the base can be found though on the other Spits used .
View attachment 787145
But it looks like the maintenace crews could overpainted it though ...
View attachment 787144
the pic sourcer: the net.
Interesting roundel in foreground and the fifth one behind it
Andy - I had to go back and refresh on the info that George posted. It seems that, as I understand it, S/N MJ452 (decals as provided by ICM) belongs to VZ@L. VZ@J should be carrying S/N MJ275. It looks like I can either try and find a couple of 'L's (completely changing the pilot and missions?) or try and use the '2' and the '5' from the supplied and find a '7', chopping up the decal? I'll look and see if I can find a couple of 'useable' 7's in my decal stash. Thanks for the offer, but this is not that important, not like a missing wing of the like.I must admit the base of the antenna colour was not something I noticed until Geo pointed it out. I could see it being left unpainted from the factory, depending on when the antenna mast was installed, but am of the opinion that aircraft that were repainted may well have had the plates painted over unless there was a technical reason not to paint them. Judging by the photos Wojtek posted, it would appear that overpainting was common.
Ralph, if you can confirm what numbers you need, I can have a look. I have lots of left over s/n decals.
Andy - I had to go back and refresh on the info that George posted. It seems that, as I understand it, S/N MJ452 (decals as provided by ICM) belongs to VZ@L. VZ@J should be carrying S/N MJ275. It looks like I can either try and find a couple of 'L's (completely changing the pilot and missions?) or try and use the '2' and the '5' from the supplied and find a '7', chopping up the decal? I'll look and see if I can find a couple of 'useable' 7's in my decal stash. Thanks for the offer, but this is not that important, not like a missing wing of the like.