Snautzer01
Honourably banned
- 42,193
- Mar 26, 2007
Douglas B-24
- Thread starter Snautzer01
- Start date
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
That's not a Martin B-10?
GrauGeist
Generalfeldmarschall zur Luftschiff Abteilung
Yeah, that's either a Martin B-10 or B-12, not a Douglas.
vikingBerserker
Lieutenant General
B-10, you can tell by the small scoop on top just behind the cowing.
GrauGeist
Generalfeldmarschall zur Luftschiff Abteilung
I have noticed several B-10 that had the scoop and several that didn't and the same goes for the B-12.
What I was looking for, was the exhaust because the P&W had a different layout than the Wright.
vikingBerserker
Lieutenant General
True, but I believe the B-12 scoop was shorter on the top.
GrauGeist
Generalfeldmarschall zur Luftschiff Abteilung
It's kind of frustrating trying to ID the Martin B-10 or B-12, because there were slight differences just between the B-10A and B-10B...like intake, antenna array and such.
For example, look at the difference between the cowl intake on your sig and the cowl intake on the B-10 at the NASM. The cowl intake raises above and behind the cowl while the intake in your sig shows the intake laying atop the cowl itself.
The intake shown in schnautzer's photo looks to be a bit smaller and angular than the B-10 at the NASM although it is situated behind and above the cowl.
For example, look at the difference between the cowl intake on your sig and the cowl intake on the B-10 at the NASM. The cowl intake raises above and behind the cowl while the intake in your sig shows the intake laying atop the cowl itself.
The intake shown in schnautzer's photo looks to be a bit smaller and angular than the B-10 at the NASM although it is situated behind and above the cowl.
The NASM doesn't have a B-10 or a B-12. I think you mean the USAFM.
GrauGeist
Generalfeldmarschall zur Luftschiff Abteilung
You know, there is a very good chance that I meant the NMUSAF but said NASM instead.
I am not responsible for anything that has been said before I've finished my morning coffee.
Hahahahahaha
vikingBerserker
Lieutenant General
The "B-10" at the NMUSAF is not a true B-10, it actually is a Martin 139WAN (Argentinian Navy) that was fixed up to resemble one. It actually is supposed to be a replica of one of the ones used in the Alaskan Flight (like my signature picture) but there were a few differences, such as the scoop. Her is a close up of the one at the museum:
You were spot on about one of the easiest ways to tell them apart is the exhaust. Even a number of pictures in the archives were mislabeled. The safest way I have been doing it is the aircraft number itself.
You were spot on about one of the easiest ways to tell them apart is the exhaust. Even a number of pictures in the archives were mislabeled. The safest way I have been doing it is the aircraft number itself.
- Thread starter
- #13
Snautzer01
Honourably banned
- 42,193
- Mar 26, 2007
Guys: first I really appreciate comments on the pics i find
Second: plse remember i (mostly) post the type name of the picture as it has been named. I am sure an admin could and should edit when consensus of type has been established. I would like that.
Second: plse remember i (mostly) post the type name of the picture as it has been named. I am sure an admin could and should edit when consensus of type has been established. I would like that.
vikingBerserker
Lieutenant General
No worries and thanks for posting. I cannot tell you how many books I have that called it the Douglas B-10 to being with!
I'm sorry my friend if you took it as a shot at you. Not at all! I look forward to ALL the pictures you post here and thank you for them!
Nice shot! Thanks for sharing.
