buffnut453
Captain
RAF Buffalos were hard pressed to hit 310 MPH at their best altitude, which was pretty low. Four .50 cal. guns are worthless if they can't be brought to bear on a fast climbing tiny aircraft that could turn on a dime. The Ki-27 may have been slower than the Buffalo but it's acceration rate was much faster from crushing speed to combat speed thus negating the Buffalos slight max speed advantage which took all day to attain. As far as telescopic gunsights go, I don' t think the scores of Commonwealth and Dutch pilots shot down by JAAF fighters ( the early Ki-43 used the same sight) were critical of their opponents lack of reflector sights.
Sorry but I fail to grasp the point you're making. Top speed has nothing to do with the speed at which the maximum rate of climb is achieved. Also, acceleration will not negate a speed advantage, particularly in a 3-D combat where diving speed is used as a suitable tactic against a slower but more manoeuverable adversary.
Read what Geoff Fisken had to say about the tactics employed, "The only thing to do was to get as much height as possible above any Japs before making an attack - preferably two or three thousand feet - when you could make the initial attack and have enough speed created in the dive to go around for a second go...This did not always work as the Jap planes outnumbered us by 10-20 to one but when it did we got victories. When it did not, we got out and lived for another go next day."
Last edited: