Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
The RN would attempt a night torpedo attack with their ASR equipped Albacores and Swordfish. If its four RN armoured carriers vs four fragile Japanese carriers I will call it a toss up.
if we're including non carrier types, then I want Gloster Meteor. Maybe substitute something like a N1K1 or Ki-84 (pretend it's suitable for Carrier ops) for the A7 since we really don't know anything real about the latter. .
if we're including non carrier types, then I want Gloster Meteor
Modernization includes upgrading the boilers by removing the middle turret to save space. Remember those coal boilers are 18 years old.The problem with the older battleships as I understand it (from Neptune's Inferno) was fuel consumption. At least for the American navy, the WW I and 1920s era ships used several times more fuel than the more modern ones. As much as a dozen or more non-capital ships.
Okay, Sea Vampire.Was Meteor really all that great as a fighter?
I'll grant you A6M5 is no match for a Sea Fury so the IJN has major problems there.
What we really need is the Mohawk being produced. Production was tried in India but failed, should have got the Aussies to build them.As for the OP, I agree that P-36 might be a good idea if they were available in time. They had a pretty good operational record almost everywhere they were used - Finland, Battle of France, India, Thailand. Even one at Pearl Harbor. Maybe if you had some kind of forewarning (code intercept?) that trouble was brewing you could send some of those French Hawks without waiting to rewire the throttles and just warn the pilots as much as you can. P-36 has one of the best climb rates of all the available second-string Allied fighters and had that dive speed to help with disengagement (thus greatly improving pilot survival rates). Correct me if I'm wrong but I don't think Mohawks or any model P-36 had any armor though, did they ever fit any? Presumably any available in time to fight in Malaya wouldn't have any which would be the main drawback for this fighter.
Cw-21 might have some value for point defense but it's risky to pilots due to no armor and quite lightly built. Then again so were F2As as it turned out. They are agile though and have an excellent (4,500 fpm) rate of climb so if they were there anyway (I believe some were in Java at any rate) then use them, but use them wisely - maybe only go up against Ki-27s or unescorted bomber raids.
Bring in any F4Fs that authorities are willing to send.
Certainly the most value / bang for the buck is to improve airfields, create some kind of early warning network (yes employ the natives - if the Rubber plantation owners are being difficult explain to them how conditions will change if the Japanese take over and force them to provide space for revetments, labor for airfields and a little extra to provide incentive / prizes for people who correctly report Japanese aircraft). Do everything possible to help with mechanics, build shelters to work on planes, etc. - even just slightly built up area to protect from flooding and a water proof cover with tarps or tents is better than working in the driving tropical rain.
It does make sense for Churchill to send all those Hurricanes and Tomahawks (although some which were sent were already clapped out) to Russia because while Malaya was perhaps 1/7th of the Imperial exchequer's balance sheet, the direct existential threat to the British State was the very, very formidable German army and the most efficient way for the British to break the German army was to have Russians do it on Russian soil.
I don't think the F2As were very good against the Japanese and I don't think it was only due to the bad airfields / outnumbered status / poor training / lack of early warning. They obviously had some utility but not much, less than other modern types IMO. Yes the Finns did well with them - with vast improvements on all those support / tactics related issues, but in the Pacific F2As performed badly with and without warning. They didn't do well with the RAF in Rangoon (usually with the benefit of warning, and alongside the AVG who did do well) they did poorly at Midway when flown by US Marines, and of course in Malaya. One problem was surely the engine used, with a 1,000 hp engine it was definitely underpowered.
But I don't think you can fully put it down to being overloaded either as I believe I remember that they did strip some down, they even used high octane fuel with them. It didn't help enough to deal with Ki-43s and A6Ms.
Aside from overloading and being underpowered, build problems and maintenance problems and all the rest, I suspect F2A may have been one of those aircraft which just didn't do well in a Tropical environment for a whole host of reasons. Operating in those kinds of conditions required a myriad of small changes to maintenance and operational practices which had to be worked out for any military aircraft in Theater, and the Buffalo may not have been deployed long enough for the shit to have hit the fan.
So, I'd say work really hard on the Buffalos you did already have there to get the most out of them (strip whatever you can, takeoff with reduced fuel and whatever else works) but don't count on those.
My suggestion for 1940-41 that I hadn't seen mentioned though which may seem a bit unorthodox is to send Fairey Fulmars. They were available. They had good range and you could send some out on regular scout flights (along with some F2A if you had them). Fulmars look pretty crap on paper and didn't do great in combat but to be honest, they didn't do nearly as badly as one would expect. One reason may be their good wing loading, plus they have a pretty good armament of 8 x .303 guns. You could even make a 'field stripped' version more suitable for CAP and fighter escort by removing the navigator* and whatever you can strip out of his station, maybe taking out a pair or two of guns, as well as arrestor hooks and any other naval equipment you don't need. Load half fuel for interception sorties. Might improve speed a bit.
I'd also recommend sending in some Martin Maryland light twin engined bombers, as an improvement over your Blenheims and a substitute for Beaufighters until the latter are available. These were used by the RAF with some success in the Med. With 1,300 mile range, high speed and a pretty high ceiling they would be useful as recon planes (which is what they were used for a lot in the MTO), as pathfinders, and light bombers. They were fast enough to easily outrun Ki-27s and could probably evade Ki-43s as well. They also had "fighter-like" handling (lower wing loading than a P-40 and power-mass was better than a Hurricane I) and four forward firing guns so they could be used to attack IJN bombers especially the flimsier types like Ki-21s. Marylands were used to shoot down some Italian bombers in the MTO, there was even a Maryland Ace. These were available by Taranto in 1940 so conceivably you could have got some to Malaya in time.
Another good recon / maritime patrol plane would be the Lockheed Hudson. They don't look so great on paper but they seem to have surprisingly good luck in scrapes with Zeros in the South Pacific and with 1,900 mile range could help a lot in finding Japanese assets out over the water. They can also be pressed into service for strafing as they had some forward facing guns.
A second Martin bomber which might be useful - it seems to have been more useful as a bomber, is the Martin Baltimore. On paper this has the same 2,000 lb bomb load as a Maryland but in action it seems to have carried more bombs and been able to hit targets some times (I suspect Maryland carried more like 1,000 lbs in most cases). Like the Maryland the Baltimore also had some forward firing guns.
Finally, I think Bristol Beauforts would be good to have. I know the Taurus gave some trouble, but with it's fairly accurate Torpedo bombing capability combined with a 1,600 mile range, the Beaufort should be a good ship killer. Certainly better than the Vikcers Vildebeest it was meant to replace in Singapore. In the actual war a small number of the 100 Australian built Beauforts delivered were actually used, and if I understand right they tried to use them as recon planes. They got shot up in that role, but I think the correct role would be as a torpedo bomber with Fulmar, P-36 or even F2As for escorts. Beauforts did pretty well later on in the PTO once crews had been properly trained and tactics adjusted.
If you could get some sent to the Theater Tomahawks and Beaufighters would be the most useful overall, IMO.
* maybe keep like 1 out of 10 with the navigator to help lead flights to their targets.
What we really need is the Mohawk being produced. Production was tried in India but failed, should have got the Aussies to build them.
Build them with a Wright R-1820-56 like on the FM-2 (once they are available, or if not ideally some two speed engine) and maybe you have a decent defense fighter, sort of what the Aussies were trying to do with the Boomerang and the Wirraway.
But you still need armor and self-sealing tanks to make the Hawk really viable past 1941.
I think the issue with the Buffalo was it was too few. Make it four hundred Buffaloes with radar direction and Japan is in for a fight.Hi,
Most of what I have read about the Buffalo didn't seen to me to support claims that it wasn't a good airplane overall.
Put in a two stage engine before that and the Mohawk would be good for 340 mph, maybe your suggestion in 43/44.
I think the issue with the Buffalo was it was too few. Make it four hundred Buffaloes with radar direction and Japan is in for a fight.
And that's what we need in the absence of the Buffalo, 400-500 of some fighter. If we exclude the Spitfire and Hurricane, that has to be a mix of Defiant, Whirlwind, Gladiator, Blenheim 1F, Beaufighter, Mohawk and Vanguard.
Agreed. But hopefully after more than two years of war, Battle of France, Norway, BoB, Malta, Greece and North Africa there are sufficient numbers of experienced pilots to more than just lead the squadrons. But if not, Malaya will have to make due with green crews. The question for us is what are they flying if there's no Buffalo, Spitfire or Hurricane?You just need 390-490 pilots who know what they are doing. Using around 90% rookies with just a few experienced pilots as squadron leaders doesn't work well in actual combat.