the lancaster kicks ass
Major General
- 19,937
- Dec 20, 2003
that's a disgusting shot to use when trying to show the looks of the P-47...........
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
DAVIDICUS said:The P-47N wasn't starting to show its abilities any more than the F4U-4. If I'm not mistaken, the F4U-4 arrived at he front lines in June of '45. The P-47N arrived at the front lines in May of the same year.
I'm obviously a fan of the P-47. 8)
From: http://home.att.net/~historyzone/Seversky-Republic8.html
Test comparisons were made with a P-47D-30-RE throughout the early portion of the evaluation period. Much to everyone's surprise, the XP-47N, with its greater wingspan and higher weight actually proved to have better roll performance than the D model. At 250 mph TAS, the N attained a maximum roll rate just over 100 degrees/second. The P-47D-30-RE could manage but 85 degrees/second at the same speed. At higher speeds, the N widened the gap further.
In mock combat with a P-47D-25-RE, the new fighter proved to be notably superior in every category of performance. In short, the XP-47 waxed the venerable D model regardless of who was piloting the older fighter. The new wing was part of this newfound dogfighting ability, however, the more powerful C series engine played a role too. The additional horsepower allowed the N to retain its energy better than the older Thunderbolt.
Perhaps the greatest performance increase was in maximum speed. Though not as fast as the stunning P-47M, the heavier N was fully 40 mph faster than the P-47D-25-RE and could generate speeds 30 mph greater than its principal rival, the Mustang. Scorching along at 467 mph @ 32,000 ft., the N could not be caught by any fighter in regular service with any air force on earth with the single exception of its M model sibling. This combination of wing and engine had pushed the N model up to the top rank of the superlative prop driven fighters then in existence.
DAVIDICUS said:Actually you said, "... so it might be in the running too."
I was just trying to push it over the edge into actual contender status.
A contender is in the running as opposed to "might be."
There was another post not too long ago that knocked around a hypothetical match up between the F4U-4 and the P-47N. In the end, the consensus seemed to be that at altitudes less than 30K, the Corsair held the edge but over 30K, the Thunderbolt was superior. It's turbo-supercharger maintains a lot more power at high altitudes.
DAVIDICUS said:Today, I think so but I really don't know. I have heard that they don't utilize the turbo-supercharger on P-47's that are still flying as the performance edge they confer is not needed for the softball flights they now do.
September 10th and 11th, at the Cincinnatti-Lunken airshow in Ohio will feature a large fly in of P-47's. "Can You Hear the Thunder" I think they are expecting about seven. I haven't made up my mind as to whether I will attend or not yet.
I thought P-38 pilots were tortured by their environmental controls. I read somewhere that the cockpit heater had two modes, on and off. Switched on, it would pipe uncomfortably hot air into the cockpit. Switched off, you'd freeze.
Gemhorse said:I'd walk on cut glass to see 7 of 'em
evangilder said:The P-47s did launch from carriers on occasion. Here they are on the deck of the Manila Bay during the Okinawa battle. Obviously, they would have great difficulty landing back on them.