Fastest Piston Engined Aircraft of WW2?

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules


Voodoo is still at the Planes of Fame in Chino and, for all the world, looks like it gets regular work done on it. Not too sure at this point whether or not the speed run wing is still on it. Can check next time I'm there, which isn't often these days.

FYI only, Yanks Air Museum P-63A is due for its first post-restoration test flight, perhaps this Friday.
 
Why did the F7F and F8F not have Grumman's STO-Wing? It was used on the F4F, F6F, TBF, TB3F and E-2 Hawkeye, but not on any of the fighters after the F6F.

Instead the A-6, F7F, F8F, F9F, F11F have straight up folds, with the later having just wingtip folds. The S-2 Tracker's fold was a different beast altogether.

Was the system considered too heavy or fragile for fast performance types, or unnecessary as the carriers and lifts became larger?
 
re "Why did the F7F and F8F not have Grumman's STO-Wing?"

I have read that part of the reason the STO-wing fold fell out of favor with late- & post-war aircraft was due to 2 primary factors, not in any primacy order:

1. The STO-fold method took up more space in the wing, and tended to interfere with placement of fuel tanks and/or other equipment (guns for example) close to the fuselage.

2. The STO-wing fold mechanism was heavier than a simple break-wing fold mechanism, and more complicated in that it did not lend itself to hydraulics as well. The article said that it also required more maintenance, and took more time to repair the aircraft if damaged.

I can not say how authoritative the article was, although it was in a USNI Proceedings magazine from the 1970s (I think).
 
It hasn't entirely been replaced even today. The AEW E-1 Tracer, E-2 Hawkeye and C-2 Greyhound use it. In each case the wings couldn't be folded vertically and still reduce the aircraft height enough to fit in a carrier hangar.

Ultimately whatever method was chosen it still had to fit in the 17' 6" hangar height of the Essex and Midway classes. The USN only moved to a 25' hangar height with the Forrestals and subsequent super carrier's until moving to 26' 6" in the Nimitz.

The E-2 was fitted with a radome that could be lowered 2' to fit the earlier carriers (but it never operated from an Essex). Now these have left the fleet it is no longer used and I believe has been deleted from the latest E-2D version.
 
Last edited:
P-51H - 487 mph @ 25,000 feet
P-47M - 470+ mph @ 30,000 feet
Spitfire F Mk.24 - 454 mph @ 29,000 feet
Spiteful F Mk.14 - 483 mph @ 21,000 feet
XP-47J - first piston powered fighter to break 500 mph: 504 mph on 4 August 1944


Plenty of others that went well beyond 450 mph during or shortly after the war.
 

Users who are viewing this thread